Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

5

a person invested $6700 for one year, part at 8%, part at 10%, and the remainder at 12%. the total annual income from these inve

stments was $716. the amount of money invest at 12% was $300 more than the amount at 8% and 10% combined. find the amount invested at each rate.

1 answer:

lukranit [14]4 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The amount invested at 8% rate is $1,200

The amount invested at 10% rate is $2,000

The amount invested at 12% rate is $3,500

Step-by-step explanation:

step 1

Let

x-----> the amount invested at 8% rate

y-----> the amount invested at 10% rate

z-----> the amount invested at 12% rate

$z=(x+y)+300$ ----> equation A

$x+y+z=6,700$ ----> equation B

substitute equation A in equation B

$x+y+(x+y+300)=6,700$

$2x+2y=6,400$

$x+y=3,200$ -----> equation C

we know that

The simple interest formula is equal to

$I=P(rt)$

where

I is the Final Interest Value

P is the Principal amount of money to be invested

r is the rate of interest

t is Number of Time Periods

in this problem we have

$t=1\ year\\ P=\$6,700\\ I=\$716$

substitute in the formula above

$716=x(0.08)+y(0.10)+z(0.12)$

substitute equation A

$716=x(0.08)+y(0.10)+(x+y+300)(0.12)$

$716=0.08x+0.10y+0.12x+0.12y+36$

$716=0.20x+0.22y+36$

$0.20x+0.22y=680$ -----> equation D

step 2

Solve the system of equations

x+y=3,200 -----> equation C

$0.20x+0.22y=680$ -----> equation D

Solve the system by graphing

The solution is the point (1,200,2,000)

see the attached figure

Find the value of z

$z=(x+y)+300$

$z=(1,200+2,000)+300=3.500$

therefore

The amount invested at 8% rate is $1,200

The amount invested at 10% rate is $2,000

The amount invested at 12% rate is $3,500

You might be interested in

15.30 find the inverse laplace transform of: 1. (a) f1(s) = 6s 2 8s 3 s(s 2 2s 5) 2. (b) f2(s) = s 2 5s 6 (s 1) 2 (s 4) 3. (c) f

EleoNora [17]

The solution of the inverse Laplace transforms is mathematically given as

$f_{1}(t)=e^{-t}\sin (2 t)$

$f_{2}(t)=\frac{7}{9} e^{-t}+\frac{2}{3} e^{-t}+\frac{2}{9} e^{-4 t}$

$f_{3}(t)=2 e^{-t}-2 e^{-2 t} \cos (2 t)-e^{-2 t} \sin (2 t)$

<h3>What is the inverse Laplace transform?</h3>

1)

Generally, the equation for the function is mathematically given as

$F_{1}(s)=\frac{6 s^{2}+8 s+3}{s\left(s^{2}+2 s+5\right)}$

By Applying the Partial fractions method

$\frac{6 s^{2}+8 s+3}{s\left(s^{2}+2 s+5\right)}=\frac{A}{s}+\frac{B s+C}{s^{2}+2 s+5}$

$6 s^{2}+8 s+3=A\left(s^{2}+2 s+5\right)+(B s+C) s$

$\begin{aligned}&3=5 A \\&A=\frac{3}{5}\end{aligned}$

Considers s^2 coefficient

$\begin{aligned}&6=A+B \\&B=6 \cdot A \\&B=\frac{27}{5}\end{aligned}$

Consider s coeffici ent

$\begin{aligned}&8=2 A+C \\&C=8-2 A \\&C=\frac{34}{5}\end{aligned}$

Putting these values into the previous equation

$&F_{1}(s)=\frac{3}{5 s}+\frac{27 s+34}{5\left(s^{2}+2 s+5\right)} \\\\&F_{1}(s)=\frac{3}{5 s}+\frac{27(s+1)}{5\left((s+1)^{2}+4\right)}+\frac{7 \times 2}{10\left((s+1)^{2}+4\right)}$

By taking Inverse Laplace Transforms

$f_{1}(t)=\frac{3}{5}+\frac{27}{5} e^{-t} \cos (2t) + \frac{7}{10}\\\\$

$f_{1}(t)=e^{-t}\sin (2 t)$

For B

$F_{2}(s)=\frac{s^{2}+5 s+6}{(s+4)(s+1)^{2}}$

By Applying Partial fractions method

$\begin{aligned}&\frac{s^{2}+5 s+6}{(s+4)(s+1)^{2}}=\frac{A}{s+1}+\frac{B}{(s+1)^{2}}+\frac{C}{s+4} \\\\&s^{2}+5 s+6=A(s+1)(s+4)+B(s+4)+C(s+1)^{2}\end{aligned}$

at s=-1

$1-5+6=3 B \\\\B=\frac{2}{3}$

at s=-4

$&16-20+6=9 C \\\\&9 C=2 \\\\&C=\frac{2}{9}$

at s^2 coefficient

1=A+C

A=1-C

A=7/9

inputting Variables into the Previous Equation

$\begin{aligned}&F_{2}(s)=\frac{A}{s+1}+\frac{B}{(s+1)^{2}}+\frac{C}{s+4} \\&F_{2}(s)=\frac{7}{9(s+1)}+\frac{2}{3(s+1)^{2}}+\frac{2}{9(s+4)}\end{aligned}$

By taking Inverse Laplace Transforms

$f_{2}(t)=\frac{7}{9} e^{-t}+\frac{2}{3} e^{-t}+\frac{2}{9} e^{-4 t}$

For C

$F_{3}(s)=\frac{10}{(s+1)\left(s^{2}+4 s+8\right)}$

Using the strategy of Partial Fractions

$\frac{10}{(s+1)\left(s^{2}+4 s+8\right)}=\frac{A}{s+1}+\frac{B s+C}{s^{2}+4 s+8}$

$10=A\left(s^{2}+4 s+8\right)+(B s+C)(s+1)$

S=-1

10=(1-4+8) A

A=10/5

A=2

Consider constants

10=8 A+C

C=10-8 A

C=10-16

C=-6

Considers s^2 coefficient

0=A+B

B=-A

B=-2

inputting Variables into the Previous Equation

$&F_{3}(s)=\frac{2}{s+1}+\frac{-2 s-6}{\left((s+2)^{2}+4\right)} \\\\&F_{3}(s)=\frac{2}{s+1}-\frac{2(s+2)}{\left((s+2)^{2}+4\right)}-\frac{2}{\left((s+2)^{2}+4\right)}$

Inverse Laplace Transforms

$f_{3}(t)=2 e^{-t}-2 e^{-2 t} \cos (2 t)-e^{-2 t} \sin (2 t)$

Read more about Laplace Transforms

brainly.com/question/14487937

#SPJ4

3 0

2 years ago

Timothy is filling fish bowls with pebbles at his fish store. He wants to have $\frac{1}{6}$ of a pound of pebbles in each fish

Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Each fish bowl to have pebbles of weight equivalent to = $\frac{1}{6}$

Total pounds of pebbles that Timothy can use = $2\frac{1}{3}$

To find:

The greatest value of Total number of fish bowls that Timothy can fill ?

Solution:

First of all, we need to convert mixed fraction into a fractional number and then we also need to see division of two fractions.

Formula:

$1. \ p\dfrac{q}{r} = \dfrac{p\times r+q}{r}\\2. \ \dfrac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}d}=\dfrac{a\times d}{b\times c}$

Now, the given mixed fraction can be converted to fractional number as:

$2\dfrac{1}{3} = \dfrac{2\times 3+1}{3} = \dfrac{7}{3}$

Now, To find the total number of fish bowls that can be filled, we need to divide the total number of pounds with number of pounds of pebbles in each fish bowl.

So, the answer is:

$\dfrac{\frac{7}{3}}{\frac{1}{6}}\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{7\times 6}{3\times 1}\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{42}{3}\\\Rightarrow \bold{14}$

<em>14</em> number of fish bowls can be filled.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the the answer to 6/12 x2/3

mr_godi [17]

To multiply two fractions together, multiply the numerators of both fractions together and same goes for the denominators.

$\frac{6}{12} * \frac{2}{3} = \frac{12}{36}$

Simplify.

$\frac{12}{36} = \frac{1}{3}$

So, 1/3 is the answer.

6 0

3 years ago

Simplify 24 - 15 - 3+ 2.6.<br> O A. 30<br> O B. 31<br> O C. 126<br> O D. 15

sveticcg [70]

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

This problem uses the teengamb data set in the faraway package. Fit a model with gamble as the response and the other variables

hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

A. 95% confidence interval of gamble amount is (18.78277, 37.70227)

B. The 95% confidence interval of gamble amount is (42.23237, 100.3835)

C. 95% confidence interval of sqrt(gamble) is (3.180676, 4.918371)

D. The predicted bet value for a woman with status = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10, which shows a negative result and does not fit with the data, so it is inferred that model (c) does not fit with this information

Step-by-step explanation:

to)

We will see a code with which it can be predicted that an average man with income and verbal score maintains an appropriate 95% CI.

attach (teengamb)

model = lm (bet ~ sex + status + income + verbal)

newdata = data.frame (sex = 0, state = mean (state), income = mean (income), verbal = mean (verbal))

predict (model, new data, interval = "predict")

lwr upr setting

28.24252 -18.51536 75.00039

we can deduce that an average man, with income and verbal score can play 28.24252 times

using the following formula you can obtain the confidence interval for the bet amount of 95%

predict (model, new data, range = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

28.24252 18.78277 37.70227

as a result, the confidence interval of 95% of the bet amount is (18.78277, 37.70227)

b)

Run the following command to predict a man with maximum values for status, income, and verbal score.

newdata1 = data.frame (sex = 0, state = max (state), income = max (income), verbal = max (verbal))

predict (model, new data1, interval = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

71.30794 42.23237 100.3835

we can deduce that a man with the maximum state, income and verbal punctuation is going to bet 71.30794

The 95% confidence interval of the bet amount is (42.23237, 100.3835)

it is observed that the confidence interval is wider for a man in maximum state than for an average man, it is an expected data because the bet value will be higher than the person with maximum state that the average what you carried s that simultaneously The, the standard error and the width of the confidence interval is wider for maximum data values.

(C)

Run the following code for the new model and predict the answer.

model1 = lm (sqrt (bet) ~ sex + status + income + verbal)

we replace:

predict (model1, new data, range = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

4,049523 3,180676 4.918371

The predicted sqrt (bet) is 4.049523. which is equal to the bet amount is 16.39864.

The 95% confidence interval of sqrt (wager) is (3.180676, 4.918371)

(d)

We will see the code to predict women with status = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10.

newdata2 = data.frame (sex = 1, state = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10)

predict (model1, new data2, interval = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

-2.08648 -4.445937 0.272978

The predicted bet value for a woman with status = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10, which shows a negative result and does not fit with the data, so it is inferred that model (c) does not fit with this information

4 0

3 years ago