1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
3 years ago
6

"The United States is too large to have a central government. People won't know their leaders and will lose control over the gov

ernment." Would a Federalist have said this to support the Constitution or would an Anti-Federalist have said this to complain about the Constitution? Explain your answer.
History
1 answer:
Setler [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Anti-Federalist who have said this to complain about the Constitution

Explanation:

The anti-Federalists in their opposition against the central government, concluded on various assumptions, among which is that the central government can lead to tyranny just like the British government under the monarchy.  The anti-Federalists also inferred that the central government would defeat democracy and encouraged the upper class (that is the richest among the citizens) to monopolize the government power to their advantage.

You might be interested in
Why is the spread of humans across the globe one of the most significant achievements for humans?
Marina CMI [18]
It is significant because we got more resources
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best explains why Texas seceded from the Union in 1861?
Luden [163]

Answer:

Tt had replaced its governor, Sam Houston, who had refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
When Mexico won is independence from Spain in 1821, Texas was?
inna [77]

Answer:

Texas was a Spanish colony

5 0
3 years ago
Name 2 reformers who helped achieve equal rights for women?
pav-90 [236]

Answer:

In 1848, a group of abolitionist activists—mostly women, but some men—gathered in Seneca Falls, New York to discuss the problem of women's rights. They were invited there by the reformers Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the reasoning behind the addition of the 3/5 Compromise? What did the South want and why?
sweet [91]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise seemed to guarantee that the South would be strongly represented in the House of Representatives and would have disproportionate power in electing Presidents.

Southern states had wanted representation apportioned by population

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is not a reason Adam Smith gave for the government getting involved in the economy?
    7·1 answer
  • Distribute<br> 3(4x + 8)<br> a. 7x + 8<br> b. 12x + 24<br> c. 7x + 24<br> d. 12x + 8
    12·1 answer
  • Summarize the significance of the state's rights issue on the Civil War.
    15·1 answer
  • How did Mexico view the Mexican Cession at the end of the war?
    9·2 answers
  • What aspects of civil rights protests helped the protesters gain public support for their cause
    8·1 answer
  • How does the policy of judicial review allow the judiciary to protect constitutional principles? (select 2 answers)
    14·1 answer
  • The Committee of Five was responsible for writing Declaration of Independence. Why were the colonists their primary audience?
    6·1 answer
  • Supporters of bilingual education point out that: ________. Select all that apply. 1) foreign-born students can learn English wh
    15·1 answer
  • How were the Christian crusaders able to get supplies while deep
    9·1 answer
  • "It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!