1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
3 years ago
6

"The United States is too large to have a central government. People won't know their leaders and will lose control over the gov

ernment." Would a Federalist have said this to support the Constitution or would an Anti-Federalist have said this to complain about the Constitution? Explain your answer.
History
1 answer:
Setler [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Anti-Federalist who have said this to complain about the Constitution

Explanation:

The anti-Federalists in their opposition against the central government, concluded on various assumptions, among which is that the central government can lead to tyranny just like the British government under the monarchy.  The anti-Federalists also inferred that the central government would defeat democracy and encouraged the upper class (that is the richest among the citizens) to monopolize the government power to their advantage.

You might be interested in
Which source of air pollution in most big cities is the worst?
Natali [406]

Answer:

factories

Explanation:

hope this helps can i have brainiest

4 0
3 years ago
The ________ allows an individual filing a complaint to have a jury decide whether he or she may recover punitive damages (in ad
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

D) Civil Rights Act of 1991.

Explanation:

The Congress of the united states enacted the Civil Rights Act on November 21, 1991. It is a U.S. labor law enacted in response to U.S. Supreme Court rulings restricting the rights of workers who have sued their employers for discriminatory practices. This included the right to trial by jury on discrimination claims and added the possibility of damages from emotional distress and caps the amount of damages a jury may award.

8 0
3 years ago
Do you agree with lincoln’s view of his authority and the way it limited what he could do about slavery?
NNADVOKAT [17]

Yes... I know that slavery was wrong because the white people were just lazy at first. I don't know if it was just because of the heat or what but that was ridiculous using people for hard labor....

6 0
3 years ago
What were the goals and terms of the homestead act?
ki77a [65]
Stay inside home at all times 
3 0
3 years ago
Rulers hired_______to advise them on how to create order and increase their royal power."​
Llana [10]
Answer: hired scholars
explanation:
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help
    5·1 answer
  • In the 1850s, who was the other party in Dred Scott’s court case? his owner Sandford his owner’s widow his enslaved worker the s
    8·2 answers
  • Which 2 islands di the portuguse have thier sugar plantions
    15·2 answers
  • Define nationalist 100 points​
    6·2 answers
  • What was the reason for the Sugar Act of 1764? (4 points)
    12·2 answers
  • Ww2 mobilization affected women by
    9·1 answer
  • One result of the contact between Europeans and American Indians was the spread of disease. Which statement best describes the e
    6·1 answer
  • What effect does war have on production
    8·1 answer
  • How did Hitler and the Nazi Party use the Reichstag Fire to their political advantage?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the ottoman empire gained power in the Middle East ?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!