1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
3 years ago
6

"The United States is too large to have a central government. People won't know their leaders and will lose control over the gov

ernment." Would a Federalist have said this to support the Constitution or would an Anti-Federalist have said this to complain about the Constitution? Explain your answer.
History
1 answer:
Setler [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Anti-Federalist who have said this to complain about the Constitution

Explanation:

The anti-Federalists in their opposition against the central government, concluded on various assumptions, among which is that the central government can lead to tyranny just like the British government under the monarchy.  The anti-Federalists also inferred that the central government would defeat democracy and encouraged the upper class (that is the richest among the citizens) to monopolize the government power to their advantage.

You might be interested in
Why is it important to be able to amend the Constitution?
masha68 [24]

Answer:

The possibility of amending the Constitution helped ensure its ratification, although many feared the powerful federal government it created would deprive them of their rights. To allay their anxieties, the framers promised that a Bill of Rights safeguarding individual liberties would be added following ratification

6 0
2 years ago
Describe the policy of appeasement used in europe prior to the war.
Roman55 [17]
<span>In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
The wording of the Constitution is...
Julli [10]
The wording of the Constitution is <span>intentionally vague for it to allow the document to survive changes in society.

I wish you the best of luck~ Sans</span>
6 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court decide in the case of Snyder v. Phelps (2011), a care free speech?
babunello [35]
D The court ruled in favor of the protesters because the justices agreed with the intent and content of the protest.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What gives each state two senators and representatives based on population in each state
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The Connecticut Compromise.

Explanation:

The Connecticut Compromise was an agreement made during the discussions for the approval of the Constitution in 1787, whereby the most and least populated states of the nation agreed on the way in which to organize the United States Congress without any of the these groups of states have an unfair advantage over the other. Thus, a bicameral Congress was organized, with a chamber organized in an egalitarian manner (the Senate) and another in proportion to the population of each state (the House).

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were Cheifdoms?
    5·1 answer
  • Which to key principles of government are included in the Declaration of Independence
    5·1 answer
  • Nobels
    12·1 answer
  • Help ASAP!! Due now!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Who has the better argument for the newly formed government, thomas jefferson or alexander hamilton
    5·1 answer
  • Which of thw following plants live in the water for survival ​
    7·1 answer
  • Did Minnesota not except slavery?
    10·1 answer
  • In at LEAST 15 sentences, summarize the Cold War
    14·1 answer
  • How did the US economy different from European economies following world war 1
    13·1 answer
  • What was the april 1961 cia-led invasion of cuba to topple fidel castro that proved to be a total failure?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!