Answer:
A) the law does not codify all ethical requirements.
Explanation:
Laws are meant to be generally and applicable to all individuals or organizations. It is absolutely impossible that laws could be made specifically for every single person, business, organization, and that it covers all their possible actions.
Imagine that there are over 32.5 million businesses in the US, that means that 32.5 million laws should be made. How many more laws regarding specific circumstances should there be?
Each company should try to have their own business ethics code, which should be followed specially by the upper management. It is a form of self-regulation, but it will all depend on the company to follow it.
Correct Question: Which of the following statements is (are) false regarding the direct method of allocating service department costs?
(A) The selection of an allocation base in the direct method is easier than the selection of an allocation base in the step method.
(B) Once an allocation is made from a service department using the direct method, no further allocations are made back to that department.
A. Only A is false.
B. Only B is false.
C. Neither A nor B is false.
D. Both A and B are false.
Answer:
A, Only A is false
Explanation:
The selection of an allocation base in the direct method is easier than the selection of an allocation base is false in that allocation base in step method allocates support costs to the support departments and the operating departments that recognise the services provided betwenn thos suport departments.
Cheers.
Answer:
To calculate the amount of interest that Cecil was charged we can use the following formula:
interest charged = (APR / 365) x 30 days x adjusted balance
where:
Adjusted balance = previous balance – current payments = $340 - $150 = $190
interest charged = (19% / 365) x 30 x $190 = $2.97
Answer:
A) conversion
Explanation:
Conversion is when someone wrongfully use property of another for their own purposes . In an action for conversion, the taking of the property may be lawful, but the retaining of the property is unlawful.
Same in this case retaining the fitness watch is unlawful to use the property which belongs to others.
Answer:
c
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
