Answer:
processing costs
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the cost incurred by Jefferson Tech Corp. is an example of processing costs. This term refers to the direct costs allocated to tools that allow the company to continue it's operations in an efficient manner. Therefore maintenance of the data management system (which is essential) are considered as processing costs.
Answer:
$950,000
Explanation:
As per IRS section 332, in the case when the parent company received a property when the complete liquidation of subsidiary company is done so the receipts of such property would not recorded either any loss or gain. Also the basis of the parent company assets would be carry over basis.
So here the basis would be $950,000
The same is to be considered
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
A cash outflow of $82 million.
Explanation:
Because during the year Shady had taxes expenses for $80 million but then Shady cancelled $2 million of the Income Tax Payable account, which decreased from $14 million to $12 million.
