It is backed by a valuable asset,
which is also known as secured credit.
Wearing an armband qualifies as a constitutionally protected right because the armbands itself represent a symbolic speech freedom. And the 1st amendment protects the freedom of speech and the freedom to wear armbands.
<h3>The first amendment protects the freedom of speech</h3>
The first amendment in the constitution of the United States of America guarantees every citizen to have the freedom of speech, including religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. So there's no restriction in the freedom of speech, including in this term: wearing armbands as a symbol of protest, like what the public school students did in Des Moines, Iowa when wearing armbands at school as a silent protest against the Vietnam War.
#SPJ4
It could affect it in various ways relating to religion since it’s usually a persons moral compass in making decisions. So if a government leader is very religious then their decisions will be heavily based on the religion they belong to.
I believe the answer is: <span>consistency of the icing and the pressure you exert on the bag or cone
Icing with low consistency tend to be more liquid and would come out more with a little force and vice versa.. The pressure that you exert on the bag or cone would determine the force that could influence how much icing would come out in one press</span>