Answer:
A) 21/7, or 3
B) 36/5, or 7 1/5
C) 35/25, or 1 15/25, or 1 3/5
D) 54/12, or 4 6/12, or 4 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
8/7 plus 13/7. You add the numerators (the numbers on top) together. That makes 21. The denominator (the numbers on bottom) stays the same. So it would be 21/7. 7 fits into 21, 3 times.
8/7 más 13/7. Agrega los numeradores (los números en la parte superior) juntos. Eso hace 21. El denominador (los números en la parte inferior) permanece igual. Entonces sería 21/7. 7 encaja en 21, 3 veces.
8/7 plus 13/7. Vous ajoutez les numérateurs (les chiffres du haut) ensemble. Cela fait 21. Le dénominateur (les chiffres du bas) reste le même. Donc, ce serait 21/7. 7 correspond à 21, 3 fois.
8/7 plus 13/7. Quarum numeratores addere (supra de numero) una. 21. Quod facit denominator est (per numeros in fundo) manebit. Ita esset 21/7. Vicium, in VII XXI, III tempora.
Answer:
1/19
Step-by-step explanation:
3(7) -2 = 19, this would be g(7) but they want g^-1 (7) so you need the inverse of your answer:
1/19.
HOPE THIS HELPS & MAKES SENSE!!!
<span>We have this equation:
</span>
and we need to find the value of x.
First of all, we multiply the whole equation for 1/2, so our goal is to isolate x, therefore:
Next step we must do is to apply <span>logarithms:
</span>
Next, we have to apply identities and then to solve the equation:
Finally, we have the value of x which was our goal. This is the answer for the question above:
I believe is C and D because
C. The original rectangle width is 2m and the length is 4m. And to make the other rectangle they are adding .5 m to both the width and length
D. The original rectangle has a width of 2m and length of 4m. To make the other rectangle they are substracting 1 m from the width and length
Answer:
second choice
Step-by-step explanation:
