Answer:
$1
Explanation:
The marginal cost refers to the cost of producing one additional unit or serving one more customer.
In this case, we have to determine the additional cost of Jacob ordering a burrito instead of a taco. As Mason chose the tacos and they agreed to split the lunch bill evenly, if Jacob decides to eat the tacos, the cost for each of them is:
$3+$3=$6/2= $3
If Jacob decides to eat the burrito:
$3+$5= $8/2= $4
So, the marginal cost to Jacob ordering a burrito is:
$4-$3= $1
Answer:
Option (B) is the right answer.
Explanation:
According to the investment company Act of 1940, the investment companies are those companies whose main business is to gathers investment capital to invest them in marketable securities.
Hence According to the scenario, the most appropriate answer is option (B).
While the other option is incorrect because of the following reason:
- Brokers/dealers can not be considered as an investment company because they are not the company.
- Pooled investments in metals are not an investment company but considered as the commodity pool.
- Insurance companies are also not investment companies.
Answer:
the statement of comprehensive income
Explanation:
The statement of comprehensive income refers to a summary in which the net assets are to be recognized for a particular period of time. It shows the adjustments made to the equity that would be highlighted also. Plus the net income could be determined by preparing an income statement
Therefore in the given case, the changes that are made in the stockholder equity would be come under the comprehensive income statement and the same is to be considered
I think the appropriate response is the boundaries of the firm. It is exercised in the vertical chain a firm ought to perform itself and which it ought to buy from autonomous firms in the market. Specifically, the most powerful work amid the most recent two decades on why firms exist, and what decides their limits, has been fixated on what has come to be known as the ''hold-up issue.
