Answer:
b. Due process has not been followed by the employer.
Explanation:
In the workplace when there is a case that could lead to dismissal, it requires the employer to first of all carry out an investigation to determine what actually happened. The facts could differ from the claims made against her.
She should also be allowed to to explain herself, this could lead to get exonerating herself or disclosing relevant information the employer did not know.
Amber can take legal action against the employer for not following due process in firing her.
Answer: C. develop separate promotional campaigns.
Explanation:
Different market segments will have different norms and values that companies will have to take advantage of in order to sell their goods or services.
They will therefore need to develop separate promotional campaigns that are aimed at taking advantage of these norms and values in order to appeal to the people in the different segments.
Answer:
The correct answers are the following:
1 - C
2 - B
3 - D
4 - A
Explanation:
1 - C: The market labor demand curve is represented graphically by the relationship between the wage rate and the quantity of labor firms are willing to hire in a market due to the fact that the firms are the ones who are looking for workers and therefore they demand it.
2 - B: The market labor supply curve is represented graphically by the relationship between the wage rate and the quantity of labor that the workers are willing to provide due to the fact that they are the one who put their work in the market in order to be used.
3 - D: The marginal product of labor represents the increase in the amount of output from an additional unit of labor that an additional worker puts in the firm.
4 - A: The value of the marginal product of labor comprehends the additional revenue the firm receives from selling the output produced from and additional unit of labor that an additional worker put in the firm.
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
A key reason for Bretton Woods' collapse was the inflationary monetary policy that was inappropriate for the key currency country of the system.
Explanation:
The US decision to suspend gold convertibility ended a key aspect of the Bretton Woods system. The remaining part of the System, the adjustable peg disappeared by March 1973.
