We know that
in the first triangle
the ratio of the legs are
4.5/1.5-----> 3
then
case <span>A) 6 m and 2 m ------> ratio=6/3----> 3
so
</span><span>the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
</span>case B) 8 m and 5 m ------> ratio=8/5---->1.6
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case C) 7 m and 3.5 mm ------> ratio=7/3.5---->2
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case D) 10 m and 2.5 m ------> ratio=10/2.5---->4
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m ------> ratio=11.25/3.75---->3
so
the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
the answer is
A) 6 m and 2 m
E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m
Answer:
6 5/6
Step-by-step explanation:
8
- 1 1/6
We need to borrow from the 8
We will borrow 1 from the 8 and make it a 7. The 1 will be written in the form 6/6
7 6/6
- 1 1/6
-----------------
6 5/6
If there is a decimal, you usually round when graphing.
Answer:
A. -0.8
Step-by-step explanation:
non of the other answers will work because they are positive.
The rates are equivalent because both of them do 30 jumping jacks a minute.
