Answer:
Quasi-contract
Explanation:
Based on what transpired between Alison and her neighbor in which the neighbor was told to pay for the landscaping service that was rendered to him/her because the contract falls under the category of QUASI- CONTRACT.
QUASI- CONTRACT is a type of contract that enables a party from unjustly or unfairly benefiting from another party despite no mutual agreement or contract exists between the two parties which is why QUASI- CONTRACT is often used in the Court of law to help prevent injustice from one party to another party, just like in the case of Alison and her neighbor in which we were told that the neighbor knew that the landscaping company was mistakenly mowing the wrong lawn.
a. power is concentrated in the hands of a few.
b. an anti-democratic bias exists in the capitalist system.
c. power is widely dispersed throughout society.
d. many people do not vote because they are alienated from the political system.
The correct answer is D.
A positive correlation is a form of statistical association which indicates that two variables tend to move jointly in the same direction.
Therefore, if there is a positive correlation between the number of years of education and the amount of a pension contribution, it means that the more years of education the higher the pension contribution earned by an individual. Therefore the pharmacist who holds a doctorate degree is the person with the highest number of years of education, and the one who should recive the largest pension contribution.
During which period of time?
Answer:
The purpose of the law.
Law as the body of rules and regulations which are authorised by each state to be obeyed by individuals citizens aims at protecting individual right and ensure that each of us do right by the other person under the prescribed and authorized legal actions. It guides our action towards others and our surroundings (i.e property and environment)
Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is intended to protect people's rights and their safety; both combined.
The law states that all the vehicles must have tittle that shows who is the owner and also recognises the agreement of lending and borrowing money. Now if the car tittle is now under this new friend who had promised to pay little by little, he is expected by the law to pay for this car under the agreement he made with her friend. The friend who gave his title of the car away to her friend has the right to sue the friend who now has a title to the car and be supported by the law to have this friend pay for it .
What could happen if the law did not exist?
They would be an increase in illegal activities and people would have no respect of other people's right that they will just walk over them. For example a person would just borrow your money and never pay you back, conflict would arise as people fight on their own for their rights and chaos will reign.
It would be hard and impossible to rule the country by the government or to maintain peace amongst its citizens.
Explanation:
