Answer:
d. Americans were allowed to bring their slaves into Texas.
Explanation:
American settlers who were allowed by the Mexican Government to settle into Texas were demanded to covert to Catholicism, to swear loyalty to the Mexican Government, and even to change their names to the respective spanish equivalent (for example <em>Jorge </em>for George, or <em>Enrique </em>for Henry). In exchange for fulfilling all these conditions, they were granted free land.
However, they were not allowed to bring their slaves with them, simply because Mexico had forbidden slavery in 1829, more than two decades earlier than the United States. Slavery was forbbiden in all of the Mexican territory, and as long mas Texas remained a part of Mexico, the settlers could not expand the slave economy that was paramount in the Deep South.
Answer:
Alexander's death was sudden and his empire disintegrated into a 40-year period of war and chaos in 321 BCE. The Hellenistic world eventually settled into four stable power blocks: the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, the Seleucid Empire in the east, the Kingdom of Pergamon in Asia Minor, and Macedon.
After the death of Alexander the Great in 323 B.C., anti-Macedonian sentiment again forced Aristotle to flee Athens. He died a little north of the city in 322, of a digestive complaint. He asked to be buried next to his wife, who had died some years before.
Yes, it prevents anything serious
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
