Answer:
E=-4.0746
Explanation:
Using the midpoint method, Lauren's income elasticity of demand for new outfits is determined by the change in income multiplied by the average number of outfits, divided by the change in the number of outfits multiplied by the average income:
Her income elasticity of demand for new outfits is -4.0746.
Answer:
For conversion costs, the equivalent units of production are 1,610 units. The right answer is B
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
begging work in progress = 280 units
units started=1450 units
Therefore, total input= 280 units + 1450 units
Total input = 1730 units
There is end work in process of 120 units
Therefore, the equivalent units of production are=Total input-end work in process
The equivalent units of production=1,730 units-120 units
The equivalent units of production=1,610 units
For conversion costs, the equivalent units of production are 1,610 units
Answer:
The land should be recorded in Clairemont Repair Service’s records at $380,000
Explanation:
According to the historical cost principle, the recording of the fixed assets should be recorded at the purchase price or cost price which is to be shown in the assets side under the balance sheet.
So, according to the question, on February 28, the repair service accepted the seller's counteroffer which means that the land was purchased on February 28 for $380,0000. So, by $380,000 amount, the land would be recorded.
Other costs which are mentioned in the question is ignored.
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, complement goods refers to those goods which are used together for example - diesel and diesel car. If the price of diesel increases then the demand for diesel cars will decrease as the consumers will shift to petrol cars or other such means.
These goods depicts negative relationship between price of one and demand for another.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A .
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": does not require estimates of bad debt losses.
Explanation:
There are mainly two approaches while recognizing bad debts (unpaid debts): <em>the allowance method </em>and <em>the direct write-off method</em>. Using the allowance method the unpaid account receivable goes through a series of stages until it is recognized as a bad debt. There are no set criteria to do so. When the firm eventually recognizes and calculates the amount of a bad expense, it is recorded in an allowance account. The negative balance diminishes the company's revenue.
The direct write-off method does not generate any allowance account. The account receivable is simply written-off after the company determines the debt as uncollectible. Thus, there is no need to estimate bad debt losses using this approach.
