Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
<span>Basis of the given information for an economy in 2016.
Dollar value of resource extraction activity = $20 billion Dollar value of production activity = $50 billion
Dollar value of distribution activity = $80 billion Dollar value of final output = $110 billion
Gross output for this economy in 2016 equals $260 billion.</span>
Answer:
c. 120
Explanation:
The economic order quantity is the minimum amount of inventory that a seller must keep to demand and lower the holding cost. The formula for Economic order quantity is represented by the formula:
EOQ = 
EOQ = 
EOQ = 120
The statement, "Common stock is a vehicle for selling ownership and another way to raise money for operations, expansion, or other business needs" is true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Common stock is a distribution tool and a way to raise capital for investment, business growth or other company needs.
Common stock is a kind of company holding, a type of safety. In many other regions of the world, the terms polling share and prevalent share are frequently were using.
The "common stock" is used mainly in the USA. These are classified as shareholdings or common shares in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth.
It means that one common stock share constitutes percentage equity of a corporation. In certain words, this is a way to split the assets of a corporation.
For example, if 100 shares were taken out, one share would amount to one percent of the company's intellectual property.
Answer: B. The firm would install the filter at a cost of $ 300,000.
Explanation:
If the community owns the property rights, they would be able to demand that the firm pay the external cost of $500,000 per year.
If on the other hand the company installed a filter, it would cost them $300,000 but then they would not have to pay the community the $500,000.
The lower cost option would be to install the filter for $300,000 which is what the firm would do.
