Answer:
y intercept = (0,-2)
x intercept = (-2,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
For y intercept, plug 0 for x
y = (0) - 2
y = -2
y intercept = -2
For x intercept, plug 0 for y
(0) = -x - 2
Move -2 to other side
-x = 2
Since x is negitave, make 2 negitave
x = -2
x intercept = -2
Answer:
66π
Step-by-step explanation:
SA= 2πrh+2πr²
SA= 2π x 3 x8 + 2π x 3x3
= 48π + 18π
=66π
hope this helps!
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
We would divide $204 by 3 to find out how much did each shopper spent. $204/3 is $68. So, each shopper spent $68. Hope this helped!
The complete question in the attached figure
we have that
(x²<span> - 25)/ (x - 5)
we know
</span>(x² - 25)-------------> (Difference of two squares)----------> (x+5)*(x-5)
then
(x² - 25)/ (x - 5)<span>-------> (x+5)*(x-5)/(x-5)------------> (x+5)
the answer is the option B)
(x+5)</span>