Answer:
It made significantly better predictions of planetary positions in our sky
Explanation:
Of the following statements the one which was not a major advantage of Copernicus's Sun-centered model over the Ptolemaic model is that it made significantly better predictions of planetary positions in our sky. Both the model made similar predictions of planetary position in our sky. In fact the Ptolemaic model was even better than the Copernicus's heliocentric model when it came to positioning of planets.
Based on the Continental drift hypothesis, it is believed that<u> B. </u><u>Continents </u><u>may </u><u>collide </u><u>in the </u><u>future</u><u>.</u>
<h3>Continental Drift Hypothesis</h3>
- Posits that continents were once part of a super continent and then broke apart.
- Posits that continents will keep moving until they collide again to form another super continent after which they will then break apart.
The hypothesis therefore posits that continents will collide at some point millions of years into the future with one such example being the Americas and Asia.
Find out more about the Continental Drift hypothesis at brainly.com/question/10665738.
After its main sequence a medium sized star like our sun becomes a red giant, it grows a lot bigger that it's regular size that it will burn earth into ciders, after that it will eject its own nebula and fade away as a dwarf star.
I don't understand the question are there answer choices
