1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
4 years ago
12

based on the miranda warning that is evolved from the supreme court case miranda v. arizona,what rights is a person entitled to

when she is arrested? give examples of what must happen when a person is accused of a crime and why these rights are necessary
History
2 answers:
stiks02 [169]4 years ago
7 0

The Miranda warning gives an accused person these rights:

The right to remain silent and not answer questions, knowing that anything said could be used as evidence against you.

The right to be represented by an attorney, who can be present during any questioning by police and defend you in court.

The right to have an attorney appointed for you if you cannot afford to hire an attorney on your own.


If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it:  "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...."  There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.


Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966.  Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman.  He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights.  After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.

Bess [88]4 years ago
4 0

The Miranda warning used by law enforcement lists several different things that citizens are entitled to including:

1) The right to remain silent- Individuals are warned that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law.

2) Right to an attorney- Individuals can have legal counsel with them throughout the process.

Individuals who are being arrested for a crime are made aware of these rights. This warning allows individuals to understand what the procedures are after the arrest and what rights they have throughout the process. These rights are used as a means to ensure that the suspect understands what is happening and it prevents law enforcement officials from violating a citizens rights.

You might be interested in
What statement best describes The Colombian Exchange?
victus00 [196]

Answer:

bgjdvfjfbjfgsf

Explanation:jhdghfjqhfjhbjfjfg

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What finally caused Germany defeat during world war 1?
Kaylis [27]
Germany lost the war because it was overwhelmed by surmounting enemy forces; it was out of soldiers and ideas, and was losing ground every day by October 1918.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The US Constitution: Preamble, Articles and Amendments
devlian [24]

Answer:

1. pretty sure its C        2.d          3.A       4. b      5. I think b. thats what makes sense to me

Explanation:

I did a very similar lesson a while back.

5 0
3 years ago
What is government? Is some of government necessary? Why or why not?
kompoz [17]

Answer:

Governments provide the parameters for everyday behavior for citizens, protect them from outside interference, and often provide for their well-being and happiness. In the last few centuries, some economists and thinkers have advocated government control over some aspects of the economy.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What are some of the grievances that the colonist had?
alexdok [17]
•The king refused to enforce laws

•He forbid the legislature from passing laws

•He refused to pass laws that would be beneficial to certain states unless they forfeited their rights of representation.

•He made it difficult for the colonists to participate in governance.

•He forbid the passing of laws that would establish judiciary power.

•He forbid judges from making decisions based on the facts of the case, as well as the law in itself. He also took away their independence to make these decisions.

•He forced the colonists to allow soldiers to stay in their homes, and did this during times of peace as well.

•He taxed citizens without their permission or approval.

•He denied Jury Trials to those who had commited crimes when the colonists would deem the trial that befitted the crime to be appropriate.

• And he refused to provide colonists protection from foreign agrresion on their own lands (colonial lands).
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was the rise of imperialism related to the growth of of industrialization?
    14·2 answers
  • The English, French, and Dutch explorers came to the New World about 100 years after the Spanish explorers.
    12·1 answer
  • Look at the Allied landing plan for the island of Iwo Jima in 1945. Click the spot you decoded in part A on this map.
    12·1 answer
  • A supreme court has jurisdiction on a case when the case has been
    6·2 answers
  • What were some of the significant changes in the US during the 1920s? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Which is one positive [good thing that suddam Hussein did for Iraq?
    8·1 answer
  • What do you know about watergate scandal
    15·1 answer
  • What might help each of the leaders solve her country’s economic problems? Use evidence from the text to support your answer.
    9·1 answer
  • Zaha hadid was the first woman to win the pritzker prize. What was her profession?.
    9·1 answer
  • Choose all the correct answers.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!