All categories

2 years ago

The opportunity cost of a choice is the _____ of the opportunities lost.a. Valueb. Interest

Business

1 answer:

vlada-n [284]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

value

Explanation:

Opportunity cost or implicit is the value of the option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.

For example, if I leave by job where i earn $100,000 per year to study economics in college. My opportunity cost is $100,000. This is the amount i would have been earning if i didn't go to college

You might be interested in

By examining relationships between items in the statement of cash flows, investors and creditors can do all of the following exc

d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

determine cash investing and financing transactions made during the period.

Explanation:

When you analyze the statement of cash flows, you can determine and predict how will operating cash flows be in the future. E.g. a project is generating high amounts of cash, so you can predict that it will continue to do so for some time. But what you cannot predict or even compare is related to the financial and investing transactions that the company will make in the future. E.g. by analyzing a cash flow you cannot know if the company will decide to invest in other projects or will it decide to issue more stocks.

5 0

3 years ago

In order to compare the real estate markets in pittsburgh and philadelphia, what are the things that you should consider?

lions [1.4K]

Answer:

When comparing the real estate market of any region or state, there are factors for consideration:

a) Population size

b) Employment status

c) Real estate market

d) Renting strength

e) Price

f) Quality in terms of home structure and a serene environment.

Explanation:

In the question, there are two American cities up for comparison: The city of Pittsburgh and the Philadelphia city, both in the Pennsylvania region. Both cities have comfortable environments which are habitable but here, we have to choose or rather compare both. The first factor is the population size. The two cities which are in the same region, have a considerable population size but when compared, Philadelphia has the upper hand. In real estate business, population is key as a region which a better and fuller population is appreciated more. The second factor is the employment status of the inhabitants. The employment status of these two cities are commendable but Pittsburgh is quite flabbergasting. The employment rate of Pittsburgh to Philadelphia is up to 57%. Employment status is a key determinant when real estate market is mentioned because employed persons are the ones who can actually pay when due. The third factor is the real estate market. This is another factor which is very important in determining the cities' real estate market. Over the years, Philadelphia has shown positive signs of a healthy real estate market which nicks that of Pittsburgh. Other factors listed above have clearly been favourable to Philadelphia because of their location but in terms of price, Pittsburgh appears cheaper with an average price of $1258 compared to Philadelphia's $1,652.

8 0

3 years ago

Porter identified three generic strategies that a business could follow after identifying a market it wanted to enter.Which of t

gogolik [260]

Answer:

B) Supplier cost differentiation

Explanation:

As per the Porter model of generic strategies, there are three strategies which are as follows

1. Cost leadership strategy: It deals with less cost to reach broad market

2. Differentiation strategy: It deals with offering different products to reach broad market

3. Focus strategy: In terms of cost leadership and differentitaion, it focused with less cost and offered unique products at narrow market segment

Therefore the option B is not included

6 0

3 years ago

Based on the following information, determine the amount of equipment on the balance sheet. Total liabilities and owner's equity

hammer [34]

Answer:

$9,950

Explanation:

The amount of equipment shall be determined through accounting equation which is given as follows:

Total Assets=Total liabilities+Total equity

Total assets=Current+Non current assets

Current assets+Non current assets=Total liabilities+Total equity

Non current assets=Cost of land+Cost of equipment-accumulated depreciation on equipment

Current assets+Cost of land+Cost of equipment-accumulated depreciation on equipment=Total liabilities+Total equity

Applying given data in the question to the above equation

$19,800+$15,000+Cost of equipment-$1,550=$44,750

$33,250+Cost of equipment=$44,750

Cost of equipment=$44,750-$33,250=$11,500

Amount of equipment on balance sheet=$11,500-$1,550=$9,950

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The price of wheatwould be â$nothingper bushelif there was no price support. In order to maintain the priceâ support, the govern

horrorfan [7]

Answer:

$5, 200 bushels of wheat

Explanation:

From the diagram the price support was at $6 per bushel, however if the government removes the price support or if there was no price support, then the price of the wheat will be $5 for a bushel. And in order to maintain the price support, from the diagram below, it is expected that the government would have to purchase 200 bushels of wheat.

4 0

3 years ago