1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
14

Respond in 6-8 sentences:

History
1 answer:
Paha777 [63]3 years ago
3 0
The British were, by and large, a dominating force. The American Colonies occupied land that the British would’ve claimed as their own. Infuriated, the British would vehemently disagree with the claim of American Colonials being treated unfairly. Throughout history, the British have experienced many successes and failures. Many times, they discover land only to lose it to another country. For example, the laborious endeavors the British had gone through to conquer India had come to waste when India decided to declare independence. Similarly, the American colonials split from the British. So no, I do not think the British thought the mistreatment towards the colonials was in any way unfair.
You might be interested in
5
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

federal power

Explanation:

The constitution states that the president has the power to make treaties with the senator's approval of course but other than that it is generally the presidents job making it a federal power

4 0
2 years ago
Why would employers want there to be large numbers of unemployed workers around?
eimsori [14]
Either they don’t want to pay them or the unemployed people don’t have the necessary things to do the job
6 0
3 years ago
Similarities between the first and second industrial revolutions
Orlov [11]

The similarity between the two Industrial Revolutions is that they both involved an increase in the degree to which machines were being used to do tasks that had once been done in other ways.  Yes, there were differences in that the earlier Industrial Revolution was more about things capital goods like steam engines while the second was about consumer goods.  But, in both cases, the main thing that was going on was an increase in the use of machinery.  This is what they have in common and what makes it legitimate to call both of these "Industrial Revolutions."

8 0
3 years ago
Reference your notes and the provided documents to write a three- to four-paragraph essay that describes how these two historica
zvonat [6]

Answer:

45

Explanation:

on edge

4 0
2 years ago
What do you think is the significance of the 54th and their leadership at fort wagner?
vampirchik [111]
1st all black regimen, but lead by a white man
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the president in 1987
    12·1 answer
  • What does john o'sullivan think america stands for?
    13·1 answer
  • What was US vs Reese significance ?
    8·1 answer
  • 3. How has the Polish government tried to guarantee that all Polish citizens have a say in the government?
    5·1 answer
  • During the medieval period, the Catholic Church:
    13·1 answer
  • What was the major purpose of the Marshall Plan?
    6·2 answers
  • It was easy for a "commoner" from the Third Estate to change his estate by acquiring wealth. A. True B. False
    9·2 answers
  • The progressive movement was primarily driven by which factor
    7·1 answer
  • What then might we conclude about the origin of the universe and its purpose?
    9·1 answer
  • why do you think only two thirds of the states are needed to propose an amendment compared to the three quarters of the states n
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!