Answer: False
Explanation: There are rules/ codes of conduct guiding every profession in this case, we shall be considering NSPE Code of Ethics I.2.Fundamental Canons: It states that Engineers, in the fulfillment of their professional duties, shall perform services only in areas of their competence.
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"
The type of fallacy that is being described in the scenario
above is the casual fallacy. A casual fallacy is having to use or conclude
ideas in which cause a certain scenario or experience in which is not even
correctly identified.
