The statement which states that there is strong empirical support indicating that learning two languages <em>interferes </em>with effective cognitive development and this statement is false.
As a result of this, we can see that cognitive development has to do with the way the brain develops with regards to what it can assimilate things and we can see that there is NO evidence which supports that learning two languages would limit this development.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more about cognitive development here:
brainly.com/question/8627797
Answer:
The factors that can create differences in perception can arise from the perceiver, like his attitude, motive, past experiences, education, and even faith. Factors produced by the target could be being a novelty, its sound, or size. The Situation can also create factors that affect perception, such as time and context.
Explanation:
Although everybody might have a different perception of reality, the reality remains the same. What we perceive as reality is not reality itself, but a constructed idea based on the aforementioned factors that become our reality. Our perceptions do reflect reality, but reality can be interpreted in as many ways as people are in the world, so we can´t expect our reality to be the only one.
Answer:
Ancillary products.
Explanation:
An ancillary product is a product that is acquired as a bonus or add-on purchase when buying another product.
Once watching the TV series, kids everywhere want to join their lives, thus buying the toys.
Im not sure but i think it is called a friend
Answer:
<em>significant others </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the term "significant other" is referred to as someone who gives very great importance to a person's well-being or life. It is described as an individual or individuals that possess a strong influence on a person's self-concept. It defined a specific relationship between two different people who share a bond and do not possess a married relation but carry a joint responsibility for oneself and the other.</em>
<em>In reference to the question above, the given statement refers to the "significant others".</em>
<em> </em>