B- travel across physical boundaries
People have power over their conduct, have the ability to make decisions about their life, and are ultimately accountable for finding solutions to their issues, according to humanistic treatment.
<h3>What is Humanistic therapy?</h3>
A holistic approach is used in humanistic treatment, with a focus on self-discovery, human potential, and free will. It seeks to assist you in forming a solid and positive sense of self, exploring your emotions, discovering purpose, and concentrating on your strengths.
Humanistic therapy can be approached in one of two ways: Empathy. You could investigate the idea that your partner doesn't care about your opinions, for instance.
By probing you about what you're currently aware of or how specific emotions make you feel, therapists encourage you to be in the "here and now." To do this, you might employ a variety of strategies, such as role-playing.
To learn more about Humanistic therapy, refer to:
brainly.com/question/11407464
#SPJ4
Answer:
problem or emotion
Explanation:
The presence of personal problems or issues which bothers the mind is almost inevitable. The only difference is that the problems individuals have to deal with aren't the same. In that case, as individuals we need to come up with a way to manage and solve interpersonal and personal issues. This act of managing personal issues is called coping.
Problem based coping is a coping management form whereby one manages issues by changing the circumstance leading to one's problem. That is if it is where we live, relocation may be a way out.
Emotion based coping involves, changing or working on our state of mind especially in cases where the circumstance leading to one's issues or problems cannot be changed.
CORRECT ANSWER:
there is no
so is the consequent
a whole may
does not constitute
there is no
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
To have an argument, you must have a factual claim and an inferential claim. This means that at least one statement in an argument must claim to present evidence, and there must be a claim that this evidence implies something. In a conditional statement, <em><u>there is no</u></em> assertion that either the antecedent or the consequent is true. Rather there is only the assertion that if the antecedent is true, then <u><em>is the consequent .</em></u>Of course, a conditional statement as <u><em>a whole way present</em></u> evidence because it asserts a relationship between statements. Yet when conditional statements are taken in this sense, a single conditional statement <u><em>does not constitute</em></u> an argument because <u><em>there is no</em></u> separate claim that this evidence implies anything.