Answer: The answer is C). God's commands are arbitrary
Explanation: Divine Command Theory is the theory that what makes something morally right is that God commands it, and what makes something morally wrong is that God forbids it.
God of course has a reason for his commands but It is still now subjected to the individual being to follow these commands through his or her free will.
Answer:
hope it helps..
Explanation:
Production by American oil companies ended up exceeding even U.S. government expectations. From 1940-1945, overall U.S. production increased by 30% from 3.7 million barrels per day to 4.7 million barrels per day. The Permian quickly became responsible for nearly 25% of the world's oil and gas production.
Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
"Preconventional" stage of moral development best describes mark.
As the first stage in moral development, preconventional morality is basically the way to deal with good and bad taken by kids. Youngsters regularly settle on moral choices in light of how it will affect them. When they use sound judgment, or don't settle on awful choices, it is less about standards or qualities and more about some kind of fortification they get. In preconventional morality, the attention is on singular results in deciding good and bad. As per Kohlberg, there are two phases of preconventional morality.
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
