Question: Why did Abbe Sieyes call for a radical restructuring of French society? Are his views more reflective of the concerns of the First Estate or the Third Estate?
Explanation:
Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes was a legitimate philosopher who occupied a dynamic part in the "French Revolution." He was commonly recognized as "Abbe." He named for a radical restructuring of the French society because he claimed that the noble individuals were duplicitous and that they troubled the middle class (Bourgeoisie) and the farmers. The Bourgeoisie and the farmers were portion of the Third Estate, thus his opinions were extra worried on this cluster of individuals. He was able to outline the frustrations and complaints of the Third Estate and this, somehow, fueled the French Revolution. He wanted sovereignty to be placed in the hands of people who were primary contributors to public service, such as the Third Estate and not the aristocrats.
Answer:
D - Alliances between nearly all European nations meant that when two went to war, all became involved.
Explanation:
As we see from the pattern of alliance and agreements, each country was wary of the other for an extended period. The alliances that were meant to ensure the safety of each country, instead pulled so many into war with each other, just because they supported or had an agreement with the other to extend support during the war.
Answer:
In September 476, a Germanic prince named Odovacar won control of the Roman army in Italy. After deposing the last western emperor, Romulus Augustus, Odovacar's troops proclaimed him king of Italy, bringing an ignoble end to the long, tumultuous history of ancient Rome. The fall of the Roman Empire was complete.
Answer: a) x= 2,38 b) x = 0,42
Explanation:
a) -3(2x + 4) = 7x + 19
-6x - 12 = 7x + 19
-6x - 7x = 19 + 12
-13x = 31
x = <u>31</u>
13
x= 2,38
b) 2x+4 = 7 -5x
2x + 5x =7 -4
7x = 3
x= <u>3</u>
7
x = 0,42
A lot of the time it can lead to war by agriculture trading