Answer:
Find attached word document with complete question.
The first revised statement showed net income $2324000 in the year and $742000 in the prior year.
The second revised statement showed net income $1,862,000 with a net income $742000 in the year 2020.
The third revised statement showed net income of $1,392,000 in the year 2021 with $742000 in the previous year.
Explanation:
Kindly attached spreadsheet showing the three revised income statements as required by the question.
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
docx
</span>
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
xlsx
</span>
The choices were <span>A. A profit center. B. A cost center. C. A revenue center.
D. An investment center.
The answer is B. a cost center.
Cost centers give profit to a company indirectly. It can come from human resources, the right people for the job are hired makes efficient work done carefully. Research and development is also a cost center because it can search for productive works and innovations that can help the company address its weaknesses. R&D can lower the budget cost and still maintain the quality of products. </span>
Answer:<em> Negative externality is defined as the cost that is incurred by a individual who isn't involved in the economic transaction.</em>
In the above question, the following is the example of negative externality: <u><em>smoking harms the health of nonsmokers who are nearby.</em></u>
Here, the cost is incurred by the nonsmokers who are standing nearby individuals who prefer smoking. Thus creating negative externality.
<u><em>Therefore, the correct option is (c)</em></u>
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
<u>Answer:
</u>
We can expect to see a large change in the quantity demanded for Good A.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- As the price change in the price of good B is inelastic, it is but clear that the price of good B would not show any fluctuations even if there is an increase or decrease in the demand for good B.
- As the price of good B is not subject to decrease in the near future, it can be expected that the demand for good A would exhibit a sudden rise.