Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Before starting the DMAIC process, most stakeholders are in agreement that there is a problem and what the problem is.
The given statement is false:
The DMAIC Process · Define the problem, improvement activity, opportunity for improvement, the project goals, and customer (internal and external) requirements.
Determine the essential elements for your business process's success. To gauge the effectiveness of the process, define process metrics. You can enhance this process' performance using the six sigma methodology. A rational, organized method to enhancing corporate operations is six sigma.
The Greek letter "Sigma," used in statistics, expresses how far a process deviates from ideal behavior. Sigma is another name for the process's standard deviation from the mean. An organization can use the Six Sigma process to count the "defects" in a process, find ways to get rid of them, and as closely as feasible to "zero defects"
Increasing the effectiveness and quality of the company presents challenges for managers. In order to succeed, they must put the best methodology and tools for process analysis and control into use. The top The procedure must be improved in order to improve the outcome.
To learn more about DMAIC process visit:brainly.com/question/14845777
#SPJ4
Answer:
The R.C.Willey furniture store has a sale for Memorial day weekend that if you purchase products that come over $499 a 60" TV can be purchased for only $300. This sales practice is known as<u> bundling.</u>
Explanation:
Here, the firm is selling two goods at a lower price, if the consumer has also brought a product, that is price tying, for it to be bundling, the firm would have made it mandatory to buy both the goods at a certain price.
Answer:
a) rise; fewer
Explanation:
In the case when the market is more optimistic so the price of the share would be increased that results in the issuance of the few shares to raise the funds that are required keeping all other constant.
Therefore in the given situation, the option a is correct
Hence, the same is to be considered
Thus, all the other options are incorrect
Answer:
A. At the top of the organization
Explanation: Top management of business Organisations includes the CEO/PRESIDENT, THE VICE PRESIDENT OR THE COO(THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER) etc they are known as the key strategists of all business Organisations, and Strategic perspective and view point should be emphasized at the top as that is the key responsibility of the top management.