Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
Answer:
The answer for the first blank is needs, the second blank is preferences.
Explanation:
The need for sustenance is a primary drive for all living creatures, including humans. The advertisement shows this by casting hungry teenagers who are seeking to fulfill this drive. Since the company producing this advertisement sells Hot Pocket, they wanted to associate ‘fulfilling the hunger drive’ with their product. That way, customers who view this advertisement are more likely to choose Hot Pocket compared to its competitors.
AD was a dark age and a period of cultural decay and decline for Europe because there was barely a government, harsh punishments, ignorant people, not a lot of land, and there was a lot of killing and diseases going around Europe that cause Europe to decline in population.
<span>a. not counted as part of the labor force</span>
Considering the 47% APR which is compounded daily, after 9 months or 275 days Marina should pay $925.98 to pay off her loan.
