Answer:
An autobiography about Bill Clinton's
What to do with the Native Americans?
Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
The statements about the colonist response to the Boston massacre that are accurate are:
- The Boston Massacre led colonists to call for a stronger boycott of British goods.
- Some colonists continued to call for resistance to British rule.
<h3>What is the Boston Massacre?</h3>
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, that started when American colonists confronted one British soldier. In time, this fight escalated and led to the death of five colonists and injuries on some other people.
The result of this massacre was that the colonists intensified their resistance against British rule while some called for the boycott of their goods.
Learn more about the Boston Massacre here:
brainly.com/question/7829931
Answer:
He was important because he provided supplies to rescue Jamestown was the main reason. Some side notes is that he was also a chief and he was also in power when the English who would form Jamestown settlement arrived in 1607.
