Answer:
It is observed that the value of test statistics (19.168) is greater than the critical value (13.277), thus the rejected hypothesis, H₀ at α = 0.01.
There is enough evidence to conclude or deduce that sales were the same for all locations
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Object: Test whether the sales were the same for all locations by applying 1% significance level.
The Null Hypothesis H₀ : Sales were the same for all locations
E₁ = 70 +75 +70+ 50 + 35/5 = 60
The Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ : Sales were not the same for all locations
Now,
The decision rule:
the Level of Significance be α = 0.01
Degrees of freedom is df= Number of categories -1
=5-1 = 4
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of part of the work solution of this given question
Answer and Explanation:
There are sure key focuses which manager should remember to guarantee a smooth coordination of the data system.
- Has the IT guide and system been resolved?
-
In view of the IT methodology, is the union arrangement for the IT frameworks set up?
- Does a solidification plan have satisfactory time and assets for mix?
- Have test plans been created?
- In light of the IT system is there an emergency course of action close by?
- Are for the most part frameworks components incorporated into the solidification plan?
- Has the arrangement for IT acquirement, physical area and assets been resolved
Answer: Extra Vacation ; Stay
Explanation:
<em>At the Nash equilibrium, Deloitte will choose </em><em><u>extra vacation</u></em><em> and Malik will respond with </em><em><u>stay</u></em><em>.</em>
A Nash Equilibrium is the optimal outcome for each player given the decisions of the other player.
Looking at the the sequential game tree, if Deloitte offered a Money Bonus, Malik would leave because it offers him a higher payout. Deloitte would not want this because they gain more when he stays.
If Malik is offered extra vacation however, Malik stands to gain more than every other option if he stays and Deloitte would therefore offer him this because it will still be a gain for them. This is the Nash equilibrium.
Answer:
INCREASED INTEREST RATES WHICH REDUCES PRIVATE SPENDING.
Explanation:
Crowding out occurs when government increases its spending thus leading to a drop in private spending. It is a deliberate government policy to push out private spending so as to create more funds for loans. This then results in increased interest rates.
So it’s 8.25 times 28 =231 hours
And there are 356 days in a year so 356 times 231 =82236 and that’s the answer hope I helped and get brainiest answer!
