Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the statement that is not possible would be Kelly having a comparative advantage in repairing cars and in cooking meals. This is because a when having a comparative advantage you are better at something but at the same time you are giving up other opportunity costs. Therefore in this scenario Kelly can only have a comparative advantage at either repairing cars or cooking meals but not both.
Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) Partnership
b) C Corporation
c) S Corporation
d) Limited Liability Company
e) Limited Liability Partnership
And the correct answer is the option D: Limited Liability Company.
Explanation:
To begin with, the name of <em>"Limited Liability Company" </em>refers to a type of form of business, in the field of business law, that is helpful to adapt and use for some owners regarding the particular characteristics that this form gives to them. So once said that, this type of business form has the characteristics of both a corporation and a partnership so that means that it is quite flexible and can adapt depending on the situation that the owner is having. Moreover, one of the most important aspects of this type of form is the fact that the owner has a limited liability to what happens in the company so that means that his private assets are secure under this form.
Answer: 75 days
Explanation:
The total customer-response time (CRT), will be calculated as:
Order received by the manufacturing department = 15 days
Add: Order put into production = 20 days
Add: Processing time = 25 days
Add: Shipping Time = 15 days
Total customer response time = 75 days
Answer:
Comment for statement A - The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
Comment for statement B - There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Explanation:
a)
“I like the IRR rule. I can use it to rank projects without having to specify a discount rate”
The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
b.
“I like the payback rule. As long as the minimum payback period is short, the rule makes sure that the company takes no borderline projects. That reduces risk”
There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Answer:
The correct answer is the second option: Product Structure.
Explanation:
To begin with, the name of "Product Structure" in the field of management refers to a type of structure used by the companies who need to organize the way they work according to that specific model. This method of inside organization consists in the separation of the areas of the company according to the type of product that each department sells. Therefore that the company Teknosa that sells three different products decides to organize its structure by those products in order to acquire unique characterization in each product that has its own departments.
