Answer:
C) a reduction in the saving rate will have an ambiguous effect on (C/N)*
Explanation:
The steady state consumption refers to the difference between how capital wears out or depreciates vs total output. In order to keep a steady state consumption, the savings rate (which equals investment) must be enough to replace any worn out or completely depreciated capital.
Since the consumption rate is already higher than the steady state consumption, the effect of a decrease in the savings rate is ambiguous. Every dollar earned by a household is either spent or saved, and in order for savings to decrease, spending must increase.
But in this case, the spending level is already too high. A decrease in savings should increase consumption but the effects of the increase in the capital labor ratio and the per capita consumption are not certain.
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the value of the forfeited benefits as a result of making a decision in a certain way. Decision making involves choosing one item over others. The cost or value of the option not chosen is the opportunity cost. The value of the forfeited option is the opportunity cost.
In choosing to go to the gym, the forgone activity is studying for the economic exam. The benefits associated with studying for the economic test is the opportunity cost. The value attached to the economic test, such as good grades, passing the test, or any reward arising from studying for the test, is the forfeited benefit and hence the opportunity cost.
Answer:
compromise
Explanation:
Compromise as a conflict resolution strategy is one that involves finding acceptable reasons such that all the parties involved in the conflict have their concerns satisfied partly.
The project manager saying "You both will have to give up something to solve this problem" means that both parties involved in the conflict will have to come to an agreement that suits or benefits both parties.
Cheers.
Purchase government of course
Answer:
the price will grow to $ 507,571.77 If it continues with the same grow rate
Explanation:
first we solve for the rate:
2006 - 1895 = 111 years
![Nominal (1+r)^{n} = FV\\150 (1+r)^{111} = 70,000\\\\r = \sqrt[111]{70,000 / 150 } -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Nominal%20%281%2Br%29%5E%7Bn%7D%20%3D%20FV%5C%5C150%20%281%2Br%29%5E%7B111%7D%20%3D%2070%2C000%5C%5C%5C%5Cr%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B111%5D%7B70%2C000%20%2F%20150%20%7D%20-1)
r = 0.06
Now we apply this rate for the year 2040:
2040 - 2006 = 34 years
Principal 70,000.00
time 34.00
rate 0.06000
Amount 507,571.77
