1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dovator [93]
3 years ago
12

True or false: The south never implemented a Telegraph system to match the North's, leaving their commanders at a disadvantage

History
1 answer:
Flura [38]3 years ago
4 0
True , is the correct answer to you’re question


In contrast the South used the telegraph in only the most limited fashion. (Source; https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/the-telegraph.html)
You might be interested in
How to restate tins i will give u lots of points
alexira [117]

Answer:

even though this may not be invoked in the prostitution cases from nonpolitical crimes or acts the purpose and principles of the untied nation are

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who developed the current form of Jainism?
spin [16.1K]
C. The Buddha

The Buddha was the leader
4 0
2 years ago
What is culture in your own words? :)
kkurt [141]
A friend of mine just asked me about this, so I have lots of thoughts about it. This may be deeper than you need, but here goes: My initial feelings about culture lead me to think of simply a “way of life” but if I think about it just a bit more, I notice that the word “way” connects to the idea of a path or perhaps even a journey – as in “let’s go this way” or “you go your way, and I’ll go mine.” Of course there is a collective nature to culture, so culture is like a collective journey or shared path. But I also get a feeling of boats on a river. Each boat has a certain level of individual freedom, but collectively they are all floating down the same river, so there is a sort of shared movement and common history despite whatever individual movements or relationships there might be among or between the individual boats. And of course rivers have branches, so some boats follow one branch while other boats follow other branches, so shared histories diverge and thus different cultures have very different characteristics.

Getting a bit more philosophical/esoteric, I also get an image of the individuals in a culture existing like cells in body. Different cells belong to different bodies, but each body defines the context – the role, function , or “meaning” – of the individual cells. The “essence” of a brain cell is different than the essence of a liver cell, and these differences in essence are correlated with their different roles – but these roles, in turn, spring from their function in the overall body – and this is what culture does; it is the larger “body” or context that defines a great deal of our essence as conscious individuals. Just as there is a degree of literal truth in the old saying “You are what you eat,” I sense a degree of literal truth in the idea that we are, to a significant degree, constituted by the culture in which we live. Our bodies are constituted by the materials we ingest, and our minds are constituted by the “psychical material” that we ingest, and the contextual meaning of this “mental food” comes from or culture. I want to emphasize the word ‘constituted’ because it is a lot stronger than just saying “influenced by” – it gets at the idea that our culture becomes part of our actual, deep, essence.

As for examples from my own life…well…since I am a philosopher, a great deal of my life IS thinking about stuff like this, so in a way, I have been speaking from my own life this whole time. For various reasons stemming from my interest in philosophy of mind, I do not believe that there are any such things as isolated (or isolatable) conscious individuals. A major part of the essence of a conscious individual is the context which provides the systems of meaning-relations that constitute the very nature of consciousness. Consciousness, I believe, is culturally constituted. Without culture there is no consciousness, and without consciousness, there are no selves, no egos. Without my consciousness there is no “me” as the individual that I am. But I know you are asking for something more personal, so let’s see…here is one concrete example: I was raised in a culture that values monogamy and devalues alternative lifestyles. For various reasons I have protested against this cultural mainstream. To borrow from my boats/river metaphor, you might say that my wife and I have spent a lot of time “swimming up stream” on this issue. Part of our role in life – one of the labels defining who we are as individuals is our membership in “alternative lifestyles”. But notice that this definition of who we are – this aspect of our identity – only has meaning in the context of a culture that values monogamy. Even tho we don’t flow with the majority, our lives are still to some extent defined by the flow of the majority – the overall flow of the culture that gives our status as “protesters” the very meaning that it has. We are who we are because of the culture, even when we don’t flow with the culture. It is part of our very essence as individuals, and we cannot abandon this essence no matter how hard we try (or at least we can’t abandon it without losing our selves in the process).
Source(s):
Sorry if I’ve rambled a bit. I’ve taken classes on hermanutics, semotics, Heidegger, Wittgenstein, etc. I don't consciously remember much of anything from these classes (I just don’t have a memory for details), but I guess I must be learning something along the way, cuz me can sure talk big words ;-) I guess you could say that the verbal diarrhea you are now experiencing is another example from my personal life. It is who I am. I am the crazy dude who spouts nonsense all over the place – the one you’d probably be embarrassed to bring home to meet your mom.
7 0
3 years ago
How are goods transported from the manufacturers to the consumers?
exis [7]

Answer:

Rail is a reliable shipping method on land and it's environmentally-friendly. You can ship machinery or even perishable goods by rail because it's fast and efficient. There are schedules and reliable delivery times, so you'll know when your goods are expected to arrive at their destination.

3 0
3 years ago
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution is significant because it a. required Taiwan to relinquish its position on the United Nations Secu
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

b. authorized the president to take any measures necessary to repel attacks against United States forces and allies in Southeast Asia.

Explanation:

The United States government declared the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964 with having support from President Johnson to use action for defending US troops stationed in Asia (Vietnam). According to him, steps needed to check the assurance of peace in Southeast Asia. The decision declared after North Vietnam attacked a US warship stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Even after the human body stops in a collision, brain damage and serious injuries can occur because __________
    11·2 answers
  • Which of these would have been MOST likely been as supporting evidence by the artist?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the name of the “lost” Inca city located high in the Andes Mountains that is one of the few completely surviving Inca cu
    9·2 answers
  • What was the core business that made Standard Oil a horizontally integrated monopoly?
    6·2 answers
  • What were the outcomes of the Council of Trent and WHY were they important/significant?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the united states prepare for world war 2? check all that apply
    13·2 answers
  • why did the invention of new spinning machinery increase the number of workers in the textile/cotton industry in Europe?
    14·1 answer
  • Can you give me an example of medicine that developed throughout the 20th century.
    10·2 answers
  • Who has the power to make decisions about elections in Great Britain
    15·1 answer
  • >
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!