<span>The product price and the average total cost determines the profit. If a company is charging a higher price than the per-unit cost, then they are earning a profit on that item. If they increase the price with everything else remaining constant, their profit increases. The opposite happens when they lower the price, all else held constant.</span>
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
Answer: Most economist believe that prices are flexible in the long run but many are sticky in the short run.
Explanation:
Prices are sticky in the short run because producers and buyers take time to adapt to new situations. If there is a shortage of butter, lets say, the economic theory says that the prices will rise because there is less butter ( ceteris paribus = all the other factors remain constant). Actually, buyers and suppliers need time to adapt to the new situation. However, in the long run buyers and suppliers have time to adapt to new situations so prices become more flexible.
Answer:
$3,585
Explanation:
The computation under the FIFO method is shown below:
The total purchase units equal to
= 10 units + 25 units + 30 units + 15 units
= 80 units
Out of 80 units, the 25 units are sold, so the remaining 55 units are come under the ending inventory. The classification is shown below:
10 units at $60 = $600
25 units at $65 = $1,625
20 units at $68 = $1,360
So, the total would be
= $600 + $1,625 + $1,360
= $3,585
B
Because the marketing company undertook the payroll service company as a cost cutting measure.