Answer:
1. $46,550
2. $405,000
3. $450,600
Explanation:
1. Computation of differential cost regarding the decision to buy the model 200
Differential cost = Cost of a new model 300 - Cost of a new model 200
Differential cost = $396,350 - $349,800
Differential cost = $46,550
So, the differential cost regarding decision to buy model 200 is $46,550.
2. Sunk costs are the costs which are already incurred by the entity in the past and which are not relevant to decision made today. In this case, sunk cost is the cost of the machine purchased seven years ago for $405,000.
3. Opportunity cost is the profit forgone by chosen alternative course of action. In this case, the Opportunity cost regarding the decision to invest in the model 200 machine is $450,600.
Answer:
The answer is b.The inclusion of a corporation's employees on its board
Explanation:
Co determination involves employees being legally allocated control rights over corporate assets through seats on the supervisory board (the board of non executive directors). The supervisory board oversees the management board (board of executive directors) approving or rejecting its decisions, and appointing its members and setting their salaries.
Answer:
Principal
Explanation:
A power of attorney (POA) is a legal document giving one person (the agent or attorney-in-fact) the power to act for another person (the principal).
Hai!
This depends on the Type of Business.
If it is a Selling Business, they sell stuff to Earn Profit.
If its a Free Online Website/Game. They earn money by either in game purchases or Web Site purchases.
Answer: D. The neighbor, because obtaining financing was a condition precedent.
Explanation:
Even though it wasn't listed in the written contract, there was the condition precedent that the contract would not be binding unless funding was obtained. Condition precedent is a condition that must happen for a contract to become enforceable.
Funding was not obtained so the contract cannot be enforced. The neighbor would therefore prevail so long as the owner admits that there was indeed a condition precedent.