Answer:
to determine her income level, we must add Mary's net salary during the first 3 months + total unemployment benefits for the first 13 weeks (April, May and June) + unemployment benefits for the next 13 weeks (July, August and September) + her normal income received during the last part of the year
total income = ($40,000 x 1/4) + ($947 x 13 weeks) + ($347 x 13 weeks) + ($40,000 x 1/4) = $10,000 + $12,311 + $4,511 + $10,000 = $36,822
total spending = normal spending level during 6 months + reduced spending level for the other 6 months
total spending = ($39,000 x 1/2) + ($39,000 x 1/2 x 9/10) = $19,500 + $17,550 = $37,050
<h2>"Social audit documents" will give Katelyn the information about how socially the company has involved to protect the planet and people.</h2>
Explanation:
Let us understand what a social audit is.
- It is an official evaluation about the involvement in social responsibility projects by the organization.
- It creates an impact on the governance.
- This prevents public relations crises associated with ethical or legal misconduct.
- Narrow gaps between vision and reality.
- It enters into action when there is no equal employment opportunity, when the environmental quality gets affected, etc.
The social activities that it includes are:
- volunteer events
- work environment
- employees wages
- utilization of energy
- charitable contributions
Answer:
$171,619.20
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what The budgeted accounts payable balance at the end of November is closest to:
Using this formula
Budgeted accounts payable balance= Budgeted cost of raw materials purchases in November -(Budgeted cost of raw materials purchases in November*Raw materials purchases in the month of purchase percentage)
Let plug in the formula
Budgeted accounts payable balance=$286,032 - ($286,032*40%)
Budgeted accounts payable balance=$286,032 - $114,412.80
Budgeted accounts payable balance= $171,619.20
Therefore The budgeted accounts payable balance at the end of November is closest to:$171,619.20
Answer: B. No. Imposing a price control below the equilibrium price in a market causes the quantity of the good available to consumers to fall because sellers will supply a smaller quantity, thereby causing some consumers to go without food that they would have been able to buy in the absence of the price control.
Explanation:
If price controls are introduced below the equilibrium price in the market, farmers or sellers will supply less to the market because they will not be incentivized to produce more seeing as they are not making what they should be making.
This, coupled with increased demand on account of food being cheaper, will lead to shortages which would mean that those that could have been able to afford the food at the equilibrium price would not be able to access food leading to even worse food shortages.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option D, Legal Market for a market price that is lower.
Explanation:
If there is a store which sells the goods at the market price even though the government authorities have set the minimum price that can be charged, it means store is selling the product at a price which is higher than the minimum price set by the government, but it doesn't mean that the store owner is doing any illegal trading. This is because the government has set the lower price limit but that ceiling price is non binding. It is not necessary for the market sellers to sell at the price given by government. So they are operating in a legal market for a market price that is lower.
