The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The suggestions that I think he might have made to the two sides if he had gotten them together to discuss a peace treaty would have been the following.
First, I would have recommended US President Woodrow Wilson to tell both sides of the conflict to meet at a neutral site; in this case, I would have invited them to New York City.
Then, President Wilson would open a series of meetings and negotiations letting the European countries know the kind of suffering, pain, and damage the war would produce to each and every country involved. President Wilson could show a forecast of the possible consequences.
Finally, showing the moral authority of the US at that time, he could have invited both sides to leave their expansionist interests and leave the occupied territories and stop the threats of invasion. This could have been a good-will sign to move on with diplomatic agreements.
The two motives that Spain to establish colonies in the Americas is totrade in beaver fur to discover a route to the Pacific Ocean to discover a new route to India and China. The Colonial expansion under the crown of Castile was initiated by the Spanish conquistadores and developed by its administrators and missionaries. The motivations for colonial expansion were trade and the spread of the Catholic faith through indigenous<span> conversions.</span>
Answer:
I believe the answer is the last option but I would argue this question is too subjective based that these options effectiveness could change based on how persistent you are and who is receiving your actions.
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. A bill of rights would be added when the new government began.
The idea of a Bill of Rights was what the anti-federalists wanted in the new US Constitution. This group of individuals felt that the new system of government gave too much power to the federal (aka central) government. The anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights put into the Constitution that ensured that the federal government would not take away key rights of American citizens. This includes the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to bear arms, etc.