1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
3 years ago
15

This map shows that the earliest colonial settlements were usually found __________. A) very close together. B) next to major ri

vers. C) next to large bodies of waters. D) at the base of mountain ranges.
History
2 answers:
BigorU [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C) next to large bodies of waters.

love your name

have a good day, and be safe

-Hops

kari74 [83]3 years ago
5 0
C is correct, large bodies of water
You might be interested in
HELP FAST!!!!!! FIRST TO HELP GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!
Sholpan [36]

In 60 BC, Caesar, Crassus and Pompey formed the First Triumvirate, a political alliance that dominated Roman politics for several years. Their attempts to amass power as Poplars were opposed by the Optimates within the Roman Senate, among them Cato the Younger with the frequent support of Cicero. Caesar rose to become one of the most powerful politicians in the Roman Republic through a string of military victories in the Gallic Wars, completed by 51 BC, which greatly extended Roman territory. During this time he both invaded Britain and built a bridge across the Rhine river. These achievements and the support of his veteran army threatened to eclipse the standing of Pompey, who had realigned himself with the Senate after the death of Crassus in 53 BC. With the Gallic Wars concluded, the Senate ordered Caesar to step down from his military command and return to Rome. Leaving his command in Gaul would mean losing his immunity to criminal prosecution by his enemies; knowing this, Caesar openly defied the Senate's authority by crossing the Rubicon and marching towards Rome at the head of an army.[2] This began Caesar's civil war, which he won, leaving him in a position of near unchallenged power and influence.

6 0
2 years ago
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Please help me wit dis ITS ONLY ONE QUESTION
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

C. They needed the constitution to approve the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

The Federalists did not want a bill of right. They thought the new constitution was sufficient. But, the anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

Hope this helps

-Amelia

4 0
3 years ago
Does anyone have tips on making an online world history class more interesting? I’m having a very hard time.
Deffense [45]

Answer:

Get more into real life situations. For example something that will make this decade more interested. Instead of something for 1875 that everyone will get bored of.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
How did democratic traditions emerge in the american colonies
White raven [17]

It is very much hard to answer.

It was mainly because of how the North and the South of America had different lifestyles and economy's. You would be surprised to know that the Democratic party back then supported Slavery and the republicans dint support Slavery.


Plain Answer: Because of Slavery, Way of Life and Different Economy. The Democratic Party would do anything to keep themselves supported.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was not a pre-Aztec mesoamerican civilization a. the Inuit b. the olmecs c. the Toltecs d. the Maya
    15·1 answer
  • The new england colonies' economy relied heavily on
    6·1 answer
  • Why did it take until 1944 for allied to liberate prisoners of concentration camps
    6·2 answers
  • How did early documents form the basis for the rights to petition and assembly?
    11·1 answer
  • which is a primary source that supports the idea that charter colonies had greater self-government than other colonies
    5·1 answer
  • Please help with multiplication and division equations sorry it's actually math
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes how Wiesel addresses the impact of his Jewish identity on his
    15·2 answers
  • What was the immediate effect of the September 11th attacks on US airlines?
    15·2 answers
  • What ancient civilization did the quinceañera originate from
    11·1 answer
  • What is the main reason southern economy was dependent on slave labor?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!