1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
3 years ago
11

A 12-month insurance policy was purchased on Dec. 1 for $4,800 and the Prepaid insurance account was initially increased for the

payment. The required adjusting journal entry on December 31 includes a: (Check all that apply.)
Business
1 answer:
Marianna [84]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Credit to Prepaid insurance for $400 and Debit to Insurance expense for $400

Explanation:

The journal entry is given below:

Insurance expense ($4800 × 1 ÷ 12) $400  

       Prepaid Insurance  $400

(To record insurance expense)

Here the insurance expense is debited as it increased the expense and credited the prepaid insurance as it decreased the assets

You might be interested in
If total revenue goes up when the price falls, demand is said to: be price unit-elastic. have positive price elasticity. be pric
Sholpan [36]
The answer to this item is letter <em>C. PRICE ELASTIC. </em>

The price elastic demand as stated in this given corresponds to the increase or rise in the total revenue when the price is brought down or decreased. This is indicated by the PED (price elasticity of demand).

The total revenue is calculated by multiplying the total items, good, or services sold by the unit price. For the demand which is price elastic, the decrease in the price will cause a higher raise in the number of customer vying for the products and services. 
7 0
3 years ago
True or false: Partnerships are less likely to survive than sole proprietorships. True false question.
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Ida works on creating ways to ensure that customers receive goods at the right time and correct location. ida is involved in her
dalvyx [7]

disturbution, in marketing this is how we get the product to conumers

6 0
3 years ago
Consider the following information: ending inventory, $ 24,000 ; sales, $ 250,000 ; beginning inventory, $ 30,000 ; selling and
Volgvan

96,000 is the cost of goods sold.

Beginning inventory,       $30,000;

Add: Purchases,              $90,000.

Less: Ending inventory  $24,000;

Cost of Goods Sold $96,000

Cost of Goods Sold is the number of direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead charged to the units sold during the period. Presented as a deduction from net sales to obtain gross margin for the period. The cost of goods sold is the total amount paid by a company for expenses directly related to the sale of its products. Depending on the business, this may include direct labor associated with manufacturing or selling products, raw materials, packaging, and merchandise purchased for resale purposes.

Learn more about the Cost of Goods Sold at

brainly.com/question/24561653

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Considering that Holmes and Balwani are the only ones charged by the SEC and the only ones facing criminal charges, what, if any
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

The investors, board of directors and employees for Theranos are not likely to have been completely free of fault in the more than a decade long fraud. The press has called the firm 'secretive' as it struggled to find any pertinent information about the it due to their closely guarded secrets. The firm operated a website that didn't have much on it and seemed to gag its directors, investors and others from talking to the press. These alone should have been a red flag to the investors and board. The PR person also refused interviews, neglected to answer questions about the owners/founders and turned down multiple overtures by the press to try and find out what was going on behind closed doors at Theranos. This encouraged the general perception that the firm was trying to control and minimise risk and possibly to retain an air of mystery. All of which was actually designed to hide the true workings of the firm, and this should have been questioned by all the people involved in the firm.

(Leuty, 2013)

The board as illustrious as theirs would have asked for supporting documentation and reviews for all the key aspects of the company and these would have needed to be audited periodically to ensure that the board can choose the best people in key roles and to enable good decision-making.

Investors also would have done a background check on all material aspects such as legal, ethical etc. before handing over large sums of money.

Employees involved in the actual fraud - falsifying results, using other tools to get the results that their tools were supposed to generate etc. were also aware of the issues with the firm likely from the very beginning.

All three groups possibly knew some or all of the aspects of the fraud and yet they did not come forward to disclose the same to the authorities or their customers as they should have. This points to a serious moral lapse amongst all three groups. They each as a group and as individuals in that group needed to take moral responsibility for the fraudulent activities being perpetrated by the couple. As the law goes, the prime players only end up being held accountable however it would have been ethically right for all parties that knew of the fraud to come forward and expose it.

Leaving aside the monetary considerations such as fleecing investors and customers alike, the products were related to the medical field, which above all others has a responsibility to maintain a higher standard of ethics. This fraud caused countless incorrect results that would have been used in medical therapies and diagnoses leading to wrong medication allocations and patient treatments. This in turn would have led to pain and anguish of the physical kind for so many patients, all of whom are the silent sufferers in this fraud.

Legally, pain and suffering cannot be quantified (just estimated) while this is the primary damage that the couple should have actually been charged with. This extremity of damage cannot be adequately presented in a court of law however and that brings us to discussing the morality of the situation. For all of the reasons stated above, the couple and everyone involved in enabling them in the fraud - the board of directors, employees and investors, should definitely be held accountable, if not in a court of law, then at least in the court of public opinion so that fraudsters like them do not get away without paying a price for their actions. All actions have consequences and their actions or lack there of should be accounted for.

References :

Leuty, Ron (2013) Secretive Theranos emerging (partly) from shadows. San Francisco Business Times.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lyons Company deducts insurance expense of $210,000 for tax purposes in 2018, but the expense is not yet recognized for accounti
    5·1 answer
  • Glubert corp., an adhesive manufacturing company, makes a deal with an insurance company to provide its employees with life insu
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose Rainforest sells 2 comma 000 books on account for $ 19 each​ (cost of these books is $ 22 comma 800​) on October ​10, 20
    10·1 answer
  • Market anomaly refers to _______. an exogenous shock to the market that is sharp but not persistent a price or volume event that
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following does NOT hinder development for less-developed countries
    5·2 answers
  • The production plant for Ace Manufacturing has been located in the same place for over 100 years. It has just completed its new
    5·1 answer
  • A group of companies bound together to fix prices is called...?
    15·1 answer
  • Departmental overhead rates are preferred over plantwide rates when: Multiple Choice The plant makes a single product. The produ
    5·1 answer
  • Over the next few years, employers may face a severe labor shortage because ________. Group of answer choices there are fewer pe
    8·1 answer
  • Tri Fecta, a partnership, had revenues of $364,000 in its first year of operations. The partnership has not collected on $46,700
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!