Henry Wallace's description of American foreign policy was somewhere between the positions of President Truman and Soviet ambassador Novikov. Wallace acknowledged that America's policy was an attempt to establish and safeguard democracy in other nations. But he also noted that attempts to do so in Eastern Europe would inevitably be seen by the Soviets as a threat to their security, even as an attempt to destroy the Soviet Union.
President Truman's position (as stated in the speech in March, 1947, in which he laid out the "Truman Doctrine"), was that those who supported a free and democratic way of life had to oppose governments that forced the will of a minority upon the rest of society by oppression and by controlling the media and suppressing dissent.
Soviet ambassador Nikolai Novikov went as far as to accuse the Americans of imperialism as the essence of their foreign policy, in the telegram he sent sent to the Soviet leadership in September, 1946.
Henry Wallace had been Vice-President of the United States under Franklin D. Roosevelt from 1941-1945, prior to Harry Truman serving in that role. When Truman became president after FDR's death, Wallace served in the Truman administration as Secretary of Commerce. After his letter to President Truman in July, 1946, and other controversial comments he made, Truman dismissed Wallace from his administration (in September, 1946). Truman and Wallace definitely did not see eye-to-eye on foreign policy, especially in regard to the Soviet Union.
This question asks for an essay, which is a task that only you can complete. However, we can provide some information that can help you start your work.
The Cold War was a period in history in which the Soviet Union and the United States (along with their respective allies) engaged in an ideological and geopolitical struggle for global influence. While the United States argued that its main objective was to spread democracy all over the world, I believe that the politics of this time were mainly dominated by a desire to be the most influential country in the world.
This is supported by the fact that many of the decisions that the United States made during this time period seem motivated more by a desire to compete with the Soviet Union than to benefit other countries. For example, the Space Race had no impact on democracy abroad. Nevertheless, it was an essential component of the Cold War and of gaining preeminence over the Soviet Union. Similarly, rivalry in sports and nuclear arsenal development are more closely related to a struggle for geopolitical influence than a desire to spread democracy.
Answer
Explanation:
The 19th century began on January 1, 1801, and ended on December 31, 1900. The term is often used to refer to the 1800s, the century between January 1, 1800 and December 31, 1899. The 19th century was the ninth century of the 2nd millennium.
The metropolitan area is a large population center consisting of one large metropolis and the surrounding area, or several neighboring central cities and the surrounding area. One or more big cities can act as a hub, and metropolitan areas are usually named according to the biggest or most important central city in them. An example is the Jabodetabek Metropolitan Area, where Jakarta is the core city and "Bodetabek" as the surrounding buffer zones have interdependent relations. Metropolitan is an urban system which means a collection of cities interacting and working together to achieve certain goals in a complex environment.
Answer:
The options are
A. They believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America.
B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
C. They feared that Latin America countries would invade the United States.
D. They worked to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America.
The answer is B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
President Roosevelt and Wilson both ruled the US and were similar and different in their approach to various conditions.
Roosevelt believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America while Wilson didn’t.They also had differences in fearing that Latin America countries would invade the United States and working to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America. They had a similar policy in the aspect of resorting frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.