The correct answer is A. Body dysmorphic
Explanation:
A body dysmorphic disorder occurs in the case of individuals that develop obsessive ideas about one specific part or aspect of their bodies and that motivate them to take extreme measures to hide or eliminate the "dysmorphic part". This is considered as a mental disorder because in most cases the aspect that is considered as imperfect does not exist or it is exaggerated by the individual. The aspects previously described match with the description of Natalie because there is an exaggerated preoccupation about her freckles that can barely be seen and she even considers plastic surgery to remove them. Therefore, Natalia may have body dysmorphic disorder.
This is an example of <u>stratification</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Social stratification means ranking the categories of people in a hierarchy. The people of U.S were segregated based on status, power and wealth. The difference in status of the Americans made a way to social stratification. Social stratification is characterized based on ethnicity, race and status.
Language and nationality of the person helps to determine the Ethnicity of the person. In such way the minority residents in any town have less access to strong schools, libraries, and recreational centers.
A secular ruler is one that is not guided by any particular form of religion. These 3 events were part of a gradual process that resulted in rulers adopting secularism.
- <u>Peace of Augsburg:</u> Signed in 1555, made it possible for rulers of the Holy Roman Empire to choose between Protestantism or Catholicism as their choice of belief.
- <u>Edict of Nantes:</u> Signed in 1598, granted the Protestants of France rights in the nation. Before this event, Protestants of France were considered as heretics.
- <u>The Peace of Westphalia:</u> Series of peace treaties signed in 1648 that ended the Religious Wars in Europe.
Answer: a bridge of contract
Explanation:
A bridge of contract from the state government. Am I sure the state government before leasing out the land must have asked the company what they wanted to use the land for and for how many duration. It is obvious that duration of the agreement , I.e the duration by which the land was leased was not stated from the passage above but to draw conclusion ,the company will most likely charge the state government based on a bridge of contract agreement as they must have told the state government what they wanted to build and there must have been terms . am alsonsure that if the company actually knew that the government was going to build a bridge on that land in the coming few years, they wouldn't have invested so much in the land . so it a bridge of contract agreement.
