Answer: 39.29%
Explanation:
For us to calculate the percentage change, we have to deduct the trading for VEF in January from the trading for VEF in February and then divide by VEF trading in January. This will be:
= (1950 - 1400)/1950
= 550/1400
= 0.3929
= 39.29%
The percentage change in January is 39.29%.
Answer:
The correct answer is to put the two variables in the same type of measure.
Explanation:
To begin with, in order to compare to different variables that are in different measures the correct way to proceed is to put them in the same measure so therefore they will be comparable with each other. Once said that, in this case the person should put the psychological benefits in economics benefits as it is the other variable and in order to do that the person should think of what aspects of his productivity would increase if he takes the vacations and gains the psychological benefits. For example, after getting back from the holidays he may feel himself less stress and more relax and therefore that he may be able to either do more job, more studies or more excercises and all that can impact in an economic way.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": includes production of foreigners working in the U.S. but excludes production by U.S. residents working in foreign countries.
Explanation:
The Gross Domestic Product or GDP represents the overall market value of all the goods and services a country produces. The GDP measures the size of the economy and it is determined by the following formula:
GDP = C+ G + I + NX
Where:
C = Private consumption
G = Government spending
I = Businesses' capital spending
NX = Net exports (exports-imports)
Labor is part of the GDP as well. It could be included in government spending or capital spending. <em>A nation's labor productivity is the sum of all the labor force production within the country regardless of the nationality of the workers</em>. <em>Citizen's productivity working abroad will be included in the GDP of the country where they work</em>.
The cengage learning for the mitigation is the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain
<u>Explanation</u>:
Mitigation of damages:
In the case of barton v. vanhorn a court would consider barton's attempts at findings similar employment a reasonable step in mitigating her damages.
Under the doctrine of damage mitigation, a wrongfully terminated employee must look for other compartable employment, and subtract whatever you make from that job from what you request in damages.
Damages in the case would be the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain.
