Answer:
1) False
2) False
3) True
4) True
Explanation:
1) International trade did not begin in 18th century but it started in between 16th and 17th century when the barter system was shifting towards mercantilism. Therefore, answer is False.
2) Twentieth-century although marked duly rise in the female sports fans but marketing efforts were not primarily shifted towards them but included them among the male sports fan base. The female fans created a new segment of marketing which resulted in creating a new product line according to their tastes and preferences. Therefore, the answer is false.
3) Economic sanction does not take into consideration only the economic factors but also various other factors like trade barriers, restrictions on financial transactions, etc. Thus, this makes the economic sanctions more restrictive in nature than the trade sanctions. Therefore, the answer is true.
4) Less affluent countries generally focuses on minimizing the cost and not maximizing the profit in order to meet there requirements effectively. Thus, such countries mostly prefer to use ethnocentric orientation of management system and therefore prefer to operate locally as this would help them minimize the cost and reduce wastage. Therefore, the answer is true.
Answer:
the cost of the equipment is $42,979
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of the equipment is as follows:
= Purchase value of an equipment + sales tax on the purchase + other cost incurred + installation cost
= $39,200 + $2,352 + 588 + $657
= $42,979
Hence, the cost of the equipment is $42,979
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
While overuse of fossil fuels will cause pollution, world without them is also difficult. A balance is required.
Explanation:
- Without fossil fuels vehicle transport for conveyance does not happen, food won't be transported, and thus life may come to standstill. It will take sometimes, centuries for the alternative sources to replace fossil fuels.
- Overuse will cause pollution to happen and the fossil fuels getting depleted. We already found that if fossil fuels are not there, world will come to standstill. Therefore, cannot deplete them.
- Balanced usage, usage with caution, and development of alternative sources are the ways to tackle the problem. These are the implications of the statements.
Answer: Broker
Explanation: An insurance broker is a person or group of persons who have the legal authority to trade or manage insurance policy of his or her clients. A broker advices the policy holder on necessary actions to take.
Under the California code insurance brokers are not permitted for life and health insurance policy.
An insurance broker is acting as a third party to his or her clients.
