Answer:
2. False
Explanation:
Capacity to a contract refers to whether the person to a contract is legally competent to enter into such a contract.
For instance, lunatics, drunkards, minors, criminals and person of unsound mind are deemed incapable of entering into a contract.
A person diagnosed with dementia, which impairs his decision making would normally be regarded as incapable to signing a contract.
But, capacity is ascertained as per the situation i.e at the time the contract is signed or entered into.
In the given case, Ronald entered a contract while he was sane and in healthy state of mind. His judgement at the time of entering such a contract wasn't impaired by dementia.
Thus, the contract will be legally enforceable as per the law.
I think it “A law of demand”?
According to dr. w. Edwards Deming's quality movement and quality efforts need to be constantly and consistently improved.
Deming is widely recognized as one of, if not the founders of total quality management. Deming is largely credited with the revolution in Japanese manufacturing management that led to the economic boom of the 1970s and 1980s.
In the 1930s, Deming was intrigued by the idea of using statistics to improve quality control. His focus was on improving production and eliminating future failures by systematically collecting failure records and investigating and correcting root causes.
Deming's philosophy known as Dr. Deming's "Management Theory" and later "systems of profound knowledge" represent a holistic approach to leadership and management. philosophy brings together an understanding of variation, epistemology, psychology, and appreciation of the system.
Learn more about Deming here brainly.com/question/26326939
#SPJ4
Answer:
The interest paid on loan was at floating rate which means that the investor earning was lower because of lower interest rate than the interest rate he was expecting.
Explanation:
Because the bond was dependent on the floating rate in the market. The borrower kept paying the investor at the floating rate not at the fixed rate which would had increased its investment worth to $1800. As $1600 is less than $1800 so the interest rate agreed was floating rate interest.
I believe that it is B. <span>but i could be wrong that seems to be the most logical answer
</span>