Answer:
They moved to California for protection from their enemies, access to stable food sources, attraction to Spanish culture and religion, fear of Spanish weapons and a desire to stay together with their clans and kin. Most of the Indians however were forced to move to California
Explanation:
Smack that "Thank you" button, Have a nice day
inflation is the general rise over time and reduction over time
Answer:
100 or higher
Explanation:
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Revised is a scale that tries to measure intelligence based on ten abilities. In addition, the IQ scores have a mean of 100 and deviation of 15. That being said, if we are considering the 50th percentile or above, then the kids selected for this test would have to have an IQ score of 100, being that 100 is the mean for the WISC-R.
Human twin and adoption studies imply that aggressive tendencies in human beings are "<span>at least partly influenced by genetics".</span>
Adoption studies are one of the great devices of behavioral genetics. These studies are used to gauge how much a characteristic shifts in light of environmental and genetic variety. Adoption studies are normally utilized together with twin studies while evaluating heritability.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.