Answer:
Fidel Castroooooooooooooooo
The correct answer is C.
The Indian Removal Act was signed by Andrew Jackson in 1830 and started the forced removal of Native Americans from their homelands in the east. Many of these tribes were forced to move west of the Mississippi River. Specifically, these tribes ended up in a territory that is now known as Oklahoma. This forced removal resulted in thousands of Native American deaths and would become known as the "Trail of Tears."
Custer's Last Stand, also known as "the Battle of Little Bighorn," was an armed fight between the combined forces of the Northern Cheyenne, the Lakota, and Arapaho tribes against the Seventh Cavalry Regiment and the United States Army. The battle started on June 25, 1876, when Custer, an officer in the United States army, discovered an Indian village that sat on the banks on the Little Bighorn River.
When Custer and his troops approached, he ordered them to attack. But what he didn't know was that this was the main encampment of the local native Americans. Custer lost the battle when he and the Seventh Cavalry Regiment got massacred by 3,000 Sioux warriors. The Native Americans felt so strongly because their land supply was dwindling, which means losing their precious metals completely would be devastating. The battle ended the next day, on June 26, and remains an iconic Native American victory.
Answer:
O. Periodic appointments would destroy a judge's independence.
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton wrote in his "Federalist Papers No. 78" how the independence of judges is important for the security of everyone. Stating that <em>"the general liberty of the people can never be endangered .... so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive"</em>. He further went to demand that <em>"independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals"</em>. He believes that independence of the judiciary from either the legislative or executive is a much needed act, for it will ensure the right and correct implementation of judgement. He proposed that <em>"complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution"</em>.
Moreover, judges' permanent appointment will ensure the rightful passing of judgement which can be flawed if the judges are appointed periodically. For no two persons are the same, so this may lead to differences in opinions which will lead to the former judgement being recanted by the next person appointed. Thus, he opines that <em>"periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence"</em>.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
I also just need points sorry :)
