Answer:
Identification of the Internal Control Weaknesses:
A. There is no segregation of duties and there is lack of access control. Jerry Miller as a security guard is not expected to have a master key to the cash box. With this he can pilfer the cash. If he prepares the report that shows the number of cars that parked on the lot, he is not supposed to also prepare the day's cash receipts. Otherwise, he can state any number of cars as parked that he likes, and which corresponds to the cash he might leave in the Cash box since he also has a master key.
B. There is no segregation of duties and there is lack of supervision, proper reconciliations, and assets audit. Sharon Fisher handles purchase transactions from the beginning to the close all alone with a third party. This exposes the company to procurement frauds and collusion with suppliers. She can purchase assets for the company at prices that would enrich her personally.
C. Forming an audit opinion on the basis of ratio analysis of last year's comparative financial statements exposes the company to audit risks. While ratio analysis is part of the basis for forming audit opinions, it is surely not the first audit procedure to obtain audit evidence to support his audit opinion on the financial statements. An auditor is expected to obtain sufficient audit evidence and perform audit substantive tests of financial statement assertions. He or she is also expected to review the internal control system to ensure that it is operating effectively after establishing its existence and reviewing changes in internal controls.
Explanation:
Internal Controls are controls established by management in order to help it achieve business goals. There are many internal controls, including Separation of Duties, Access Controls
, Authorization and Approvals, Asset Audits, Reconciliations, and Data Backups. The purposes of internal controls are to establish the reliability of financial reporting, ensure timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and achieve compliance with financial management laws, and accounting regulations.
Answer:
Check the following calculations.
Explanation:
The U.S. firm has $29 million
Investment is for three months
And the interest rate in the United States is .29 percent per month
The value of the investment if the money is invested in U.S
= $29 million *(1+ 0.29%) ^3
= $29.2530 million
The interest rate in Great Britain is .33 percent per month.
The spot exchange rate is £.629
And the three-month forward rate is £.632.
The value of the investment if the money is invested in Great Britain
Value after spot exchange = $29 million *(£.629/$1) = £ 18.241 million
Value after three months interest earning = £ 18.241*(1+0.33%) ^3
= £ 18.4222 million
Exchanging again in US $ after 3 months
= £ 18.4222 *($1/£ .632) = $29.1490 million
Therefore the value of the investment if the money is invested in Great Britain is $29.1490 million.
The value of investment will be more if the money is invested in U.S.
Because today's business are wholly dependent on technology for their survival.
This is especially in production, customer service, and marketing.
Answer:
b. contribution margin equals fixed costs
e. has a profit of $0.
Explanation:
The break even point is the point in which the firm has no profit and no loss situation. When it meets we called as break even point.
So, the break even point is the point at which the profit is zero plus the contribution margin equals to the fixed cost i.e means
Contribution margin = Fixed cost
Sales - variable cost = Fixed cost
If both are equal so it seems the profit is zero
The answer is that C<span>urt has committed conversion.
Conversion can happen even when a man mistakenly trusted that he or she was qualified for that goods. As such, great aims are not a guard against change. Somebody who occupied stolen products has conferred the tort of change regardless of the possibility that he or she did not know the goods were stolen. In the event that the genuine proprietor brings a tort activity against the purchaser, the purchaser should either restore the property to the proprietor or pay the proprietor the full estimation of the property in spite of having effectively paid the price tag to the thief.
</span>