Based on the fact that Jean and Beverly manage different sections of the business, the business organization they operate is a Partnership.
<h3>What business are Jean and Beverly operating?</h3>
Jean and Beverly can be said to be operating the business of a partnership as both of them are in charge of separate parts of the business but work together for the company's success.
<h3>Which other type of business would suit them?</h3>
Another type of business organization that might suit Jean and Beverly is a limited liability company. The main advantage of this is that it puts their personal assets out of danger in case the company fails.
Unfortunately, their accounts will become public record as anyone can access it from the Companies House.
<h3 /><h3>What type of incorporation should they do?</h3>
Jean and Beverly may one day expand to other provinces so they should go for a federal incorporation to avoid the hassle of having to incorporate in every province they expand to.
Find out more on types of business ownerships at brainly.com/question/26356434
#SPJ1
Extends the tap-and-trace provisions of existing wiretap statutes to the Internet, and mandates certain technological modifications at ISPs to facilitate electronic wiretaps on the Internet
.
Option A
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
After the fall out of terrorist attacks on September 11 2001 American congress has passed the USA Patriot Act to protect the American society from the attack of terrorism.
This act specifically allows the federal agency officials to have control over the internet communication and they can intercept the local and foreign calls which are called tap and trace.
The purpose of tap and trace of calls is for collecting the information about the terrorist activities and also for foreign intelligence.
Answer: Confidentiality / Non-Disclosure agreements
Explanation:
We've all watched movies where people discuss very secretive things over the phone or with another person while they are being driven and at some point we wonder why those discussing are not worried about the driver spilling the beans.
The reason is because these high-profile clients need to protect their privacy and so make sure that those working for them especially their security agents, sign Non-Disclosure or Confidentiality agreements that require them not to speak of the things they hear or see about their clients.
Should they breach this agreement, they will be in a wealth of legal problems as well as suffer reputational loss. Sometimes though this does not seem to work and they still breach the agreement. It is a good deterrent either way.
What are your options hun:)
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
