Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Its the babies fault, they had to big of a head to get through her cooter, so he/she killed her!
"A person supported is arrested for slapping and kicking a store clerk during a community activity."
This is assault, one party physically attacked the other.
Lets take a look at the options:
1. Allegation of abuse, neglect, or exploitation
. This could be a possible answer, but read it carefully, "ALLEGATION." This means they where accused of abuse, in this case this is not a viable option because we know the attack happened.
2. Reportable Staff Misconduct. Nope, the staff was attacked.
3. Reportable Medical Incident. This is a medical incident because the clerk was attacked, but lets look at the other options.
4. Non-reportable Incident
. No, this incident was reported to police and the suspect was arrested.
5. Criminal Conduct or Probable Criminal Conduct. Yes, this is criminal conduct. The suspect was most likely arrested for felony assault, the victim experienced significant violence amounting to substantially more than a minor slap across the face or a punch in the jaw.
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
they animals is in cages so they won't get to kill u I don't know
