Southern Democrats is the correct answer.
It was the issue of slavery which mainly divided US into northern and southern states and further Democratic party into southern Democrats and Northern Democrats. The Southern Democrats were pro-slavery and thus challenged the Northwest Ordinance's prohibition of slavery by the late 1850s.
According to different estimates, between 65,000 and 120,000 sub-Saharan Africans enter the Maghreb (Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, and Libya) yearly, of which 70 to 80 percent are believed to migrate through Libya and 20 to 30 percent through Algeria and Morocco. Several tens of thousands (not hundreds of thousands, as media coverage might suggest) of sub-Saharan Africans try to cross the Mediterranean each year.
After the First World War, and the treaty of Versailles, the economic and political situation was not good. Hitler was opposed to the new Weimar Republic. Also, as a german soldier, he found it hard to accept the defeat of the German Empire. As many nationalists, Hitler believed that Germany had lost the war due to betrayal. Socialists, communists and Jews were blamed, even though many had served in the war and many other were killed.
Hitler thought the German people were a superior race, that were destined to be the masters of Europe, and that jews, homosexuals and black people, among others, were a threat for Germany. According to Hitler, they were an inferior race, that was poisoning the german.
Answer:
A court today would not find that to be constitutionally valid.
Explanation:
There is a multitude of laws that override the censorship of press, especially to criticize the president. When there are restrictions in free speech, citizens may feel as though they are being dis-empowered. The first amendment allows for free speech, and even if the sitting president feels that it may be harmful, they have no authority to stop free speech.
The correct answer is D)Evaluate the evidence used to support it.
A good historian will read the claims of other individuals and will conduct independent reserach in order to verify their claims. If a historian is reading a research paper uses specific resources to support their claim, historians will look into the other resources to see if they are legitimate. This type of investigation results in questions such as who is publishing this paper, why are they publishing this paper, and what biases they may have. All of these questions will allow an individual to determine whether the evidence used to support it is legitimate.
