All categories

3 years ago

Can someone plz help me solved this problem I need help plz help me! Will mark you as brainiest!

Mathematics

1 answer:

vichka [17]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

See explaination

Step-by-step explanation:

Im not going to go in too much detail about how I solved each one, just because there a lot of blanks, but the general process is to just subsitute these numbers in for x:

1st column

3^2 = 9

4^2 = 16

5^2 = 25

6^2 = 36

2nd column

1 + 4 = 5

4 + 4 = 8

9 + 4 = 13

16 + 4 = 20

3rd column(same as the 1st one because it is just the expanded form of the first expression)

You might be interested in

WHICH LINE HAS A SLOPE OF 0 AND GOES THROUGH (5, -8)

arlik [135]

The slope of a horizontal line. A horizontal line has slope 0

3 0

3 years ago

Line L1 is horizontal and passes through (1,1). Line L2 is vertical and passes through (2,2). Find the point of intersection of

Sedaia [141]

(2,1)
that's going to be your answer.

4 0

3 years ago

Use the recursive relationship to complete the next two rows of Pascal's triangle. Row 5: 1 _ _ _ _ 1 Row 6: 1 _ _ _ _ _ 1

frosja888 [35]

Answer:

1 5 10 10 5 1 Row 5

1 6 15 20 15 6 1 Row 6

Recursive relationship:

Each row has number of positions = row number + 1. The Row 0 is always 1.

The first and last number in each row is 1, the number in the second position and the penultimate corresponds to the number of the row. The middle numbers correspond to the sum of the two numbers in the top row. The resulting number from the addition is located in the middle of the numbers added in the next row.

Step-by-step explanation:

The pascal's triangle

* Row 0 = 1

* Row 1 = 1 1

1 Row 0

1 1 Row 1

Since there are only two positions, the first and last are 1.

*Row 2 = 1 _ 1

1 Row 0

1 1 Row 1

1 2 1 Row 2

2 is the sum of 1 + 1 and we place it in the next row between the added numbers 1 and 1.

* Row 3 = 1 _ _ 1

1 Row 0

1 1 Row 1

1 2 1 Row 2

1 3 3 1 Row 3

1 + 2 = 3 (the row number and the and adding the numbers from the previous row)

* Row 4 = 1 _ _ _ 1

1 Row 0

1 1 Row 1

1 2 1 Row 2

1 3 3 1 Row 3

1 4 6 4 1 Row 4

1 + 3 = 4 (the row number)

3 +3 = 6

* Row 5 = 1 _ _ _ _ 1

1 Row 0

1 1 Row 1

1 2 1 Row 2

1 3 3 1 Row 3

1 4 6 4 1 Row 4

1 5 10 10 5 1 Row 5

1 + 4 = 5

4 + 6 = 10

* Row 6 = 1 _ _ _ _ _ 1

1 Row 0

1 1 Row 1

1 2 1 Row 2

1 3 3 1 Row 3

1 4 6 4 1 Row 4

1 5 10 10 5 1 Row 5

1 6 15 20 15 6 1 Row 6

1 + 5 = 6

5 + 10 = 15

10 + 10 = 20

3 0

3 years ago

Identify which of these designs is most appropriate for the given experiment: completely randomized design, randomized block

Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

Completely Randomized Design

Step-by-step explanation:

In a completely randomized design, the samples are randomly assigned to the treatment without creating any blocks or groups.

Like here, in the given scenario, we do not have to divide subjects in two groups as they are all same.

Whereas, in a randomized block design, the participants are divided into subgroups in a way, that the variability within the blocks is less than the variability between blocks.

After dividing, the participants within each block are randomly assigned to treatment conditions.

Hence, the completely randomized design is used here.

3 0

3 years ago

Is subtraction associated in rational number ? explain with an example.

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

No, subtraction is NOT associative in rational numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation: We are asked to state whether subtraction is associative in rational numbers or not. To explain with an example. The subtraction is NOT associative in rational numbers.

8 0

3 years ago