1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
4 years ago
7

Holt and collins decide to have their dispute arbitrated by corrales. What will not be a result of the arbitration?

Law
1 answer:
Savatey [412]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

If Holt and Collins retain the right to a Class action.

Explanation:

Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of court. The Parties involved in the case refer their disputes to an arbitrator who will making a decision after reviewing the evidence and listening to the parties.

Arbitration clauses can be mandatory or voluntary, and the arbitrator's decision may be binding or nonbinding. (binding means you are not going to court again, but would abide by the decisions if the arbitrator).

Furthermore, the Arbitration is a legal technique used by the parties involved in a dispute to resolve the disputes outside the courts, the parties refer the disputes to one or more persons called either the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal", by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound.

Then A "class action" lawsuit or the

"mass tort litigation" is one in which a group of people with the same or similar injuries caused by the same product or action sue the defendant as a group. It can also be called the "multi-district litigation".

If Holt and Collins decide to retain the right to a Class action, it will definitely not be the result of an arbitration.

You might be interested in
What are two common strategies that interest groups use to shape public
erica [24]

Answer:

PACs

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information is considered.
jarptica [38.1K]

Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

<h3>What is economic espionage?</h3>
  • Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
  • Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
  • Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
  • Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
  • President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
  • It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
  • It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.

Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

Know more about economic espionage here:

brainly.com/question/28218496

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
I’m sooooooooooooooooooooo confused
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Public morals

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When public buses reenter traffic after making a stop, who has the right-of-way?
Leto [7]

Answer:

A. Right-of-way should be given to the flow of traffic.

Explanation:

Right of way which is the right given to people that are on the road in-order to make use of the road before others are part of the rules and regulations guiding road usage.<em> In the case of the scenario given above, the Right-of-way should be given to the flow of traffic. That is why most buses re-entering the traffic needs to wait till there was minimal traffic before re-entering those traffic.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the best definition of it scientific theory ​
amm1812

Answer: A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Road rage is a term often used to describe the act of a physical assault that arrives from a
    5·1 answer
  • I NEED REAL ANSWER OF THIS I WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
    10·1 answer
  • 4.What is organized crime? What typical activities are included in organized crime?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is it important to know who is responsible for making laws in the government?
    15·1 answer
  • What force young children to go on streets to star live there
    15·1 answer
  • • Does Pennsylvania state have some kind of ban on texting while driving?
    7·2 answers
  • If you were to design a vehicle feature that monitors changes to the mass of the car, what scientific concepts would you think a
    8·2 answers
  • Should Cuomo resign or not and why?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain in detail how lobbyists impact the laws that are written.
    5·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!