Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
$3 trillion
Explanation:
Given that,
GDP = $15 trillion
consumption = $10 trillion
Government spending = $2.5 trillion
Taxes = $1 trillion
Net capital inflow = $0.5 trillion
Investment:
= GDP - Consumption - Government spending + Net capital inflow
= $15 - $10 - $2.5 + $0.5
= $3 trillion
We know that savings is equal to investment spending.
Therefore, the total savings for the economy of Neverwhere is $3 trillion.
Answer:
$5,456
Explanation:
A relevant cost can be defined as the cost that are said to be in form of a future cash cost that is relevant and important to a particular decision.
The relevant cost:
Current market cost 880 liters × Current market $6.20 per liter
= $5,456.
Therefore the relevant cost of the 880 liters of the raw material when deciding how much to bid on the special order will be $5,456
Answer:
MASTER
Explanation:
Apparently it says to write it so that's is what I did is there anything wrong about that bye
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.