1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
7

The difficulty in cost-benefit analysis is that the benefits are usually evident and easily measurable, while the costs are not

always evident or measurable.A) True B) False
Business
1 answer:
suter [353]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B) False

Explanation:

Under the cost benefit analysis a statement is prepared in order to compute the financial aspects of the transaction.

This clearly provides for the estimate to be made towards all the transactions.

But there is a problem in such analysis that exact estimate or even nearby estimate in terms of amount is not feasible to be computed of benefits and cost as well.

And significantly all the benefits can not be traced monetarily.

You might be interested in
How do safe investments usually have a lower rate of return than riskier ones?
densk [106]

Students should understand that every saving and investment product has different risks and returns. Differences include how readily investors can get their money when they need it, how fast their money will grow, and how safe their money will be.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An estimate based on an analysis of receivables shows that $790 of accounts receivables are uncollectible. the allowance for dou
erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

The  adjusting entry at the end of the year will include a credit to allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of $910.

Explanation:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts balance should be Credit balance, Since we have $120 debit balance and want to create $790 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts credit balance we have to credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts by ($790 + $120 = $910) to get Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $790 Credit balance.

Therefore, The  adjusting entry at the end of the year will include a credit to allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of $910.

7 0
3 years ago
In the year 2010, the income per worker in the United States was $82,359 and the income per worker in South Korea was $54,315. T
zhenek [66]

Answer:

The difference in human capital explains $7,863 of the income per worker gap while the difference in physical capital explains $20,181 of the income per worker gap.

Explanation:

Human capital refers to the skills, knowledge, and efforts of the people in producing goods and services. It is also known simply as labor. Physical capital refers to the "man-made" goods that assist in production, including machinery, equipment, and technological items such as computers.

In the given scenario, the income per worker in the United States is $82,359 - $54,315 = $28,044 more than the income per worker in South Korea. This is explained by differences in both the level of technology (i.e. physical capital) and the capability of workers (i.e. human capital).

We are informed that the income per worker in South Korea would be $74,496 if it had the same level of technology as the United States. This means that $74,496 - $54,315 = $20,181 of the income per worker gap between the two countries is explained by differences in physical capital. Hence the remaining difference of $28,044 - $20,181 = $7,863 is explained by differences in human capital between the two countries.

5 0
3 years ago
What is $5.30 reduced by 10%
Yuki888 [10]
To get this answer you can simply move the decimal over one.

Or you can multiple 5.30 *0.10 = 0.53

So you can then subtract 0.53 from 5.30 to get the answer of:

$4.77
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is there a trade-off between standardization and innovation? how are the two related in most companies?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
Standardization and innovation play critical roles in the development of goods and services. Standardization allows for a stabilized starting point in which to move forward and develop other goods and services which is related to innovation. Standardization provides stability, a known factor which can be relied upon, whereas innovation is riskier and may not come to be successful endeavor. However, like all risk, that is the payoff for the investment in innovation, for if the innovative good or service can be successfully brought to market, the dividends for a payout can be well worth it.
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to communist theory, the value of a commodity is determined by the
    11·1 answer
  • Do left-handed or right-handed people make more money? one study1 recorded the hourly earnings for a random sample of american m
    5·1 answer
  • Regina has made the same sales presentation twice a day for almost a month. At first, the presentation seemed to flow nicely but
    15·1 answer
  • What happens when there are only a few large customers in the market?
    7·1 answer
  • Quizlet:Suppose the demand for a Czech novel translated into English is perfectly inelastic. Assume the initial price of the tra
    12·1 answer
  • Bob's electronics company has quite a buzz around a new television they're launching, called UltraView1000. This television is e
    10·1 answer
  • An analyst gathered the following information about a company: 01/01/04 - 50,000 shares issued and outstanding at the beginning
    12·1 answer
  • Bond X is noncallable and has 20 years to maturity, a 11% annual coupon, and a $1,000 par value. Your required return on Bond X
    9·1 answer
  • Which famous landmark has an apartment built on top of it?.
    9·2 answers
  • Japan and other market-based economies enjoy economic growth, but also face greater risks due to:.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!